» Articles » PMID: 23417003

Evaluation of Bovine Feces-associated Microbial Source Tracking Markers and Their Correlations with Fecal Indicators and Zoonotic Pathogens in a Brisbane, Australia, Reservoir

Overview
Date 2013 Feb 19
PMID 23417003
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was aimed at evaluating the host specificity and host sensitivity of two bovine feces-associated bacterial (BacCow-UCD and cowM3) and one viral [bovine adenovirus (B-AVs)] microbial source tracking (MST) markers by screening 130 fecal and wastewater samples from 10 target and nontarget host groups in southeast Queensland, Australia. In addition, 36 water samples were collected from a reservoir and tested for the occurrence of all three bovine feces-associated markers along with fecal indicator bacteria (FIB), Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli O157, and Salmonella spp. The overall host specificity values of the BacCow-UCD, cowM3, and B-AVs markers to differentiate between bovine and other nontarget host groups were 0.66, 0.88, and 1.00, respectively (maximum value of 1.00). The overall host sensitivity values of these markers, however, in composite bovine wastewater and individual bovine fecal DNA samples were 0.93, 0.90, and 0.60, respectively (maximum value of 1.00). Among the 36 water samples tested, 56%, 22%, and 6% samples were PCR positive for the BacCow-UCD, cowM3, and B-AVs markers, respectively. Among the 36 samples tested, 50% and 14% samples were PCR positive for the Campylobacter 16S rRNA and E. coli O157 rfbE genes, respectively. Based on the results, we recommend that multiple bovine feces-associated markers be used if possible for bovine fecal pollution tracking. Nonetheless, the presence of the multiple bovine feces-associated markers along with the presence of potential zoonotic pathogens indicates bovine fecal pollution in the reservoir water samples. Further research is required to understand the decay rates of these markers in relation to FIB and zoonotic pathogens.

Citing Articles

Assessing the nucleic acid decay of human wastewater markers and enteric viruses in estuarine waters in Sydney, Australia.

Ahmed W, Korajkic A, Gabrewold M, Payyappat S, Cassidy M, Harrison N Sci Total Environ. 2024; 926:171389.

PMID: 38432386 PMC: 11070875. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171389.


An overview of molecular markers for identification of non-human fecal pollution sources.

Zlender T, Rupnik M Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1256174.

PMID: 38075863 PMC: 10701406. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1256174.


High-Throughput Microfluidic Quantitative PCR Platform for the Simultaneous Quantification of Pathogens, Fecal Indicator Bacteria, and Microbial Source Tracking Markers.

Hill E, Chun C, Hamilton K, Ishii S ACS ES T Water. 2023; 3(8):2647-2658.

PMID: 37593240 PMC: 10428101. DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.3c00169.


A review of the current status of in fish.

Couso-Perez S, Ares-Mazas E, Gomez-Couso H Parasitology. 2022; :1-13.

PMID: 35166202 PMC: 10090634. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182022000099.


Evaluation of Glass Wool Filters and Hollow-Fiber Ultrafiltration Concentration Methods for qPCR Detection of Human Adenoviruses and Polyomaviruses in River Water.

Ahmed W, Gyawali P, Toze S Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020; 227(9):327.

PMID: 32214527 PMC: 7089043. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-016-3026-5.


References
1.
Fong T, Griffin D, Lipp E . Molecular assays for targeting human and bovine enteric viruses in coastal waters and their application for library-independent source tracking. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(4):2070-8. PMC: 1082535. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.2070-2078.2005. View

2.
Boon N, Top E, Verstraete W, Siciliano S . Bioaugmentation as a tool to protect the structure and function of an activated-sludge microbial community against a 3-chloroaniline shock load. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69(3):1511-20. PMC: 150069. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1511-1520.2003. View

3.
Hill V, Polaczyk A, Hahn D, Narayanan J, Cromeans T, Roberts J . Development of a rapid method for simultaneous recovery of diverse microbes in drinking water by ultrafiltration with sodium polyphosphate and surfactants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(11):6878-84. PMC: 1287739. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6878-6884.2005. View

4.
Stoeckel D, Harwood V . Performance, design, and analysis in microbial source tracking studies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73(8):2405-15. PMC: 1855604. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02473-06. View

5.
Boehm A, Fuhrman J, Mrse R, Grant S . Tiered approach for identification of a human fecal pollution source at a recreational beach: case study at Avalon Bay, Catalina Island, California. Environ Sci Technol. 2003; 37(4):673-80. DOI: 10.1021/es025934x. View