» Articles » PMID: 23412291

Limitation of Total Hip Arthroplasty of the Acetabular Roof by Press-fit Without Screw Fixation: Discussion of a Biomechanical Study

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Feb 16
PMID 23412291
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In total hip arthroplasty of the acetabular roof fixed by press-fit without screw fixation, there is little possibility for loosening to occur, because it is difficult for wear debris to enter between the cup and the acetabular roof, as screw holes are not present. However, stability is provided only by contact. In the case of acetabular dysplasia, it is not well understood whether sufficient initial fixation power is provided. We performed a torsion test and a lever-out test. In the torsion test, in the case of a normal hip joint, as the cup grew bigger, the fixation power tended to increase in strength. In the acetabular dysplasia model, with cups of each size, as the protrusion angle increased, the fixation power of the cup tended to become weak. When the protrusion angle approaches 15 degrees, we must use a cup that is 4 mm larger than the original cup to achieve the same initial fixation power. Furthermore, when the protrusion angle is 15 degrees in cups that are over 48 mm in size, we obtain fixation power that is theoretically adequate, but when small cups, for example, 46 mm in size are set with protrusion, the initial fixation power decreases significantly, and we cannot obtain a fixation power that is theoretically adequate.

Citing Articles

Differences in acoustic parameters of hammering sounds between successful and unsuccessful initial cementless cup press-fit fixation in total hip arthroplasty.

Homma Y, Zhuang X, Watari T, Hayashi K, Baba T, Kamath A Bone Jt Open. 2024; 5(3):154-161.

PMID: 38423101 PMC: 10904203. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0160.R1.


Objective evaluation for initial stability of highly porous cup without screws in total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

Kobayashi H, Homma Y, Tanabe H, Watari T, Ochi H, Banno S J Orthop. 2019; 17:97-100.

PMID: 31879483 PMC: 6919348. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.08.008.


Laser Resonance Frequency Analysis: A Novel Measurement Approach to Evaluate Acetabular Cup Stability During Surgery.

Kikuchi S, Mikami K, Nakashima D, Kitamura T, Hasegawa N, Nishikino M Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(22).

PMID: 31717400 PMC: 6891423. DOI: 10.3390/s19224876.


Influence of cup-center-edge angle on micro-motion at the interface between the cup and host bone in cementless total hip arthroplasty: three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Kaku N, Tabata T, Tsumura H Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25(8):1271-7.

PMID: 26319002 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1697-z.


Initial stability of cementless acetabular cups: press-fit and screw fixation interaction--an in vitro biomechanical study.

Tabata T, Kaku N, Hara K, Tsumura H Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 25(3):497-502.

PMID: 25421640 PMC: 4363363. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1571-4.


References
1.
Schmalzried T, Wessinger S, Hill G, Harris W . The Harris-Galante porous acetabular component press-fit without screw fixation. Five-year radiographic analysis of primary cases. J Arthroplasty. 1994; 9(3):235-42. DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90077-9. View

2.
Haddad R, Cook S, Brinker M . A comparison of three varieties of noncemented porous-coated hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72(1):2-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B1.2298788. View

3.
Pagnano W, Hanssen A, Lewallen D, Shaughnessy W . The effect of superior placement of the acetabular component on the rate of loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(7):1004-14. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199607000-00004. View

4.
Fokter S, Repse-Fokter A, Takac I . Case report: femoral neuropathy secondary to total hip arthroplasty wear debris. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(11):3032-5. PMC: 2758980. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0894-7. View

5.
Schmalzried T, Jasty M, Harris W . Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74(6):849-63. View