» Articles » PMID: 23410255

Pharmacokinetic Study on Pradofloxacin in the Dog - Comparison of Serum Analysis, Ultrafiltration and Tissue Sampling After Oral Administration

Overview
Journal BMC Vet Res
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 Feb 16
PMID 23410255
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pradofloxacin, a newly developed 8-cyano-fluoroquinolone, show enhanced activity against Gram-positive organisms and anaerobes to treat canine and feline bacterial infections. The purpose of this cross-over study was to measure the unbound drug concentration of pradofloxacin in the interstitial fluid (ISF) using ultrafiltration and to compare the kinetics of pradofloxacin in serum, ISF and tissue using enrofloxacin as reference.

Results: After oral administration of enrofloxacin (5 mg/kg) and pradofloxacin (3 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg, respectively), serum collection and ultrafiltration in regular intervals over a period of 24 h were performed, followed by tissue sampling at the end of the third dosing protocol (pradofloxacin 6 mg/kg). Peak concentrations of pradofloxacin (3 mg/kg) were 1.55±0.31 μg/ml in the ISF and 1.85±0.23 μg/ml in serum and for pradofloxacin (6 mg/kg) 2.71±0.81 μg/kg in the ISF and 2.77±0.64 μg/kg in serum; both without a statistical difference between ISF and serum. Comparison between all sampling approaches showed no consistent pattern of statistical differences.

Conclusions: Despite some technical shortcomings the ultrafiltration approach appears to be the most sensitive sampling technique to estimate pharmacokinetic values of pradofloxacin at the infection site. Pharmacokinetics - Pradofloxacin - Ultrafiltration - Dog - Oral Administration.

Citing Articles

Moxidectin is a candidate for use as an internal standard in pharmacokinetic studies, as demonstrated with use in simultaneous tissue cage and ultrafiltration fluid collection.

Munn R, Whittem T Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1332974.

PMID: 38292465 PMC: 10824831. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1332974.


Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin.

Azzariti S, Mead A, Toutain P, Bond R, Pelligand L Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37887249 PMC: 10603860. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12101548.


The Use of Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance in Veterinary Medicine, a Complex Phenomenon: A Narrative Review.

Caneschi A, Bardhi A, Barbarossa A, Zaghini A Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36978354 PMC: 10044628. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12030487.


Systematic Review of the Pharmacological Evidence for the Selection of Antimicrobials in Bacterial Infections of the Central Nervous System in Dogs and Cats.

Hertzsch R, Richter A Front Vet Sci. 2022; 8:769588.

PMID: 35118150 PMC: 8803749. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.769588.


Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Dermal Interstitial Fluid Using Dissolving Microneedles.

Ito Y, Inagaki Y, Kobuchi S, Takada K, Sakaeda T Int J Med Sci. 2016; 13(4):271-6.

PMID: 27076783 PMC: 4829539. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.13601.

References
1.
Blondeau J . A review of the comparative in-vitro activities of 12 antimicrobial agents, with a focus on five new respiratory quinolones'. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999; 43 Suppl B:1-11. DOI: 10.1093/jac/43.suppl_2.1. View

2.
Cars O . Pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in tissues and tissue fluids: a review. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990; 74:23-33. View

3.
Silley P, Stephan B, Greife H, Pridmore A . Comparative activity of pradofloxacin against anaerobic bacteria isolated from dogs and cats. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007; 60(5):999-1003. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm346. View

4.
Leegsma-Vogt G, Janle E, Ash S, Venema K, Korf J . Utilization of in vivo ultrafiltration in biomedical research and clinical applications. Life Sci. 2003; 73(16):2005-18. DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3205(03)00569-1. View

5.
McKellar Q, Bruni S, Jones D . Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of antimicrobial drugs used in veterinary medicine. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2004; 27(6):503-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00603.x. View