» Articles » PMID: 23408591

Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Focused Shock Waves in the Treatment of Jumper's Knee in Athletes

Overview
Journal Am J Sports Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Feb 15
PMID 23408591
Citations 74
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tendinopathies represent a serious challenge for orthopaedic surgeons involved in treatment of athletes.

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections and focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in athletes with jumper's knee.

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Forty-six consecutive athletes with jumper's knee were selected for this study and randomized into 2 treatment groups: 2 autologous PRP injections over 2 weeks under ultrasound guidance (PRP group; n = 23), and 3 sessions of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (2.400 impulses at 0.17-0.25 mJ/mm(2) per session) (ESWT group; n = 23). The outcome measures were Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) questionnaire, pain visual analog scale (VAS), and modified Blazina scale. A reviewer who was blinded as to the group allocation of participants performed outcome assessments before treatment and at 2, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Nonparametric tests were used for within-group (Friedman/Wilcoxon test) and between-group (Kruskal-Wallis/Fisher test) testing, and the significance level was set at .05.

Results: The 2 groups were homogeneous in terms of age, sex, level of sports participation, and pretreatment clinical status. Patients in both groups showed statistically significant improvement of symptoms at all follow-up assessments. The VISA-P, VAS, and modified Blazina scale scores showed no significant differences between groups at 2-month follow-up (P = .635, .360, and .339, respectively). The PRP group showed significantly better improvement than the ESWT group in VISA-P, VAS scores at 6- and 12-month follow-up, and modified Blazina scale score at 12-month follow-up (P < .05 for all).

Conclusion: Therapeutic injections of PRP lead to better midterm clinical results compared with focused ESWT in the treatment of jumper's knee in athletes.

Citing Articles

A comparative analysis of platelet-rich plasma alone versus combined with extracorporeal shockwave therapy in athletes with patellar tendinopathy and knee pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Jhan S, Wu K, Chou W, Chen P, Wang C, Huang W Knee Surg Relat Res. 2024; 36(1):47.

PMID: 39690426 PMC: 11650825. DOI: 10.1186/s43019-024-00252-3.


Advanced Non-Operative Interventions for Anterior Knee Pain.

Katz N, Tsitsilianos N, Nowak A, Douglas S, Tenforde A, Borg-Stein J Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024; 17(12):589-615.

PMID: 39527393 PMC: 11652466. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09930-x.


Effectiveness of Injection Strategies on Patients With Patellar Tendonitis (Jumpers' Knee): A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Wang S, Lyu B Sports Health. 2024; :19417381241263338.

PMID: 39101544 PMC: 11569575. DOI: 10.1177/19417381241263338.


Impact of Centrifugation Parameters on Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Patella Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zhang E, Lie V, Wong K Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63341.

PMID: 39070376 PMC: 11283629. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63341.


Role of orthobiologics in managing patellar tendinopathy: A narrative review.

Banerjee S, Balamarthandapuram Gopalakrishna R, Elhence A J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(3):e12099.

PMID: 39055393 PMC: 11269623. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.12099.