» Articles » PMID: 23408100

Potential Distribution of Dengue Fever Under Scenarios of Climate Change and Economic Development

Overview
Journal Ecohealth
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Feb 15
PMID 23408100
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dengue fever is the most important viral vector-borne disease with ~50 million cases per year globally. Previous estimates of the potential effect of global climate change on the distribution of vector-borne disease have not incorporated the effect of socioeconomic factors, which may have biased the results. We describe an empirical model of the current geographic distribution of dengue, based on the independent effects of climate and gross domestic product per capita (GDPpc, a proxy for socioeconomic development). We use the model, along with scenario-based projections of future climate, economic development, and population, to estimate populations at risk of dengue in the year 2050. We find that both climate and GDPpc influence the distribution of dengue. If the global climate changes as projected but GDPpc remained constant, the population at risk of dengue is estimated to increase by about 0.28 billion in 2050. However, if both climate and GDPpc change as projected, we estimate a decrease of 0.12 billion in the population at risk of dengue in 2050. Empirically, the geographic distribution of dengue is strongly dependent on both climatic and socioeconomic variables. Under a scenario of constant GDPpc, global climate change results in a modest but important increase in the global population at risk of dengue. Under scenarios of high GDPpc, this adverse effect of climate change is counteracted by the beneficial effect of socioeconomic development.

Citing Articles

Nano-interventions for dengue: a comprehensive review of control, detection and treatment strategies.

Shaikh S, Sandeep Chary P, Mehra N Inflammopharmacology. 2025; .

PMID: 39976669 DOI: 10.1007/s10787-025-01655-8.


Intersecting vulnerabilities: climatic and demographic contributions to future population exposure to -borne viruses in the United States.

Rohat G, Monaghan A, Hayden M, Ryan S, Charriere E, Wilhelmi O Environ Res Lett. 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 38585625 PMC: 10997346. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9141.


Projecting the future incidence and burden of dengue in Southeast Asia.

Colon-Gonzalez F, Gibb R, Khan K, Watts A, Lowe R, Brady O Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):5439.

PMID: 37673859 PMC: 10482941. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41017-y.


Neglected tropical diseases risk correlates with poverty and early ecosystem destruction.

Magalhaes A, Codeco C, Svenning J, Escobar L, Van de Vuurst P, Goncalves-Souza T Infect Dis Poverty. 2023; 12(1):32.

PMID: 37038199 PMC: 10084676. DOI: 10.1186/s40249-023-01084-1.


Impacts of El Niño Southern Oscillation on the dengue transmission dynamics in the Metropolitan Region of Recife, Brazil.

Ferreira H, Nobrega R, Brito P, Pires Farias J, Amorim J, Moreira E Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2022; 55:e0671.

PMID: 35674563 PMC: 9176733. DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0671-2021.


References
1.
Jones K, Patel N, Levy M, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman J . Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008; 451(7181):990-3. PMC: 5960580. DOI: 10.1038/nature06536. View

2.
Jackson M . Disease and diversity in history. (Reviews of: Cartwright, FF, Biddiss, M. Disease and history. Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing Limited, 2000; Rotberg RI, ed. Health and disease in human history. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000; Cliff, A.,.... Soc Hist Med. 2003; 15(2):323-40. DOI: 10.1093/shm/15.2.323. View

3.
Reiter P, Lathrop S, Bunning M, Biggerstaff B, Singer D, Tiwari T . Texas lifestyle limits transmission of dengue virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003; 9(1):86-9. PMC: 2873752. DOI: 10.3201/eid0901.020220. View

4.
McMichael A . Environmental and social influences on emerging infectious diseases: past, present and future. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359(1447):1049-58. PMC: 1693387. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1480. View

5.
Reiter P . Yellow fever and dengue: a threat to Europe?. Euro Surveill. 2010; 15(10):19509. View