» Articles » PMID: 23404522

The Trajectory of the Target Probability Effect

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2013 Feb 14
PMID 23404522
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of target probability on detection times is well-established: Even when detection accuracy is high, lower probability targets are detected more slowly than higher probability ones. Although this target probability effect on detection times has been well-studied, one aspect of it has remained largely unexamined: How the effect develops over the span of an experiment. Here, we investigated this issue with two detection experiments that assessed different target probability ratios. Conventional block segment analysis and linear mixed-effects modeling converged on two key findings. First, we found that the magnitude of the target probability effect increases as one progresses through a block of trials. Second, we found, by examining the trajectories of the low- and high-probability targets, that this increase in effect magnitude was driven by the low-probability targets. Specifically, we found that low-probability targets were detected more slowly as a block of trials progressed. Performance to high-probability targets, on the other hand, was largely invariant across the block. The latter finding is of particular interest because it cannot be reconciled with accounts that propose that the target probability effect is driven by the high-probability targets.

Citing Articles

Predicting cognitive scores from wearable-based digital physiological features using machine learning: data from a clinical trial in mild cognitive impairment.

Rykov Y, Patterson M, Gangwar B, Jabar S, Leonardo J, Ng K BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):36.

PMID: 38273340 PMC: 10809621. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03252-y.


It's not always about me: The effects of prior beliefs and stimulus prevalence on self-other prioritisation.

Falben J, Golubickis M, Wischerath D, Tsamadi D, Persson L, Caughey S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020; 73(9):1466-1480.

PMID: 32292104 PMC: 7604934. DOI: 10.1177/1747021820913016.


Orientation Probability and Spatial Exogenous Cuing Improve Perceptual Precision and Response Speed by Different Mechanisms.

Jabar S, Anderson B Front Psychol. 2017; 8:183.

PMID: 28228744 PMC: 5296305. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00183.


Rare targets are less susceptible to attention capture once detection has begun.

Hon N, Ng G, Chan G Psychon Bull Rev. 2015; 23(2):445-50.

PMID: 26335411 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0921-5.


Probability cueing influences miss rate and decision criterion in visual searches.

Ishibashi K, Kita S Iperception. 2014; 5(3):170-5.

PMID: 25469223 PMC: 4249987. DOI: 10.1068/i0649rep.