» Articles » PMID: 23404069

Tradeoffs in Basal Area Growth and Reproduction Shift over the Lifetime of a Long-lived Tropical Species

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2013 Feb 14
PMID 23404069
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding of the extent to which reproductive costs drive growth largely derives from reproductively mature temperate trees in masting and non-masting years. We modeled basal area increment (BAI) and explored current growth-reproduction tradeoffs and changes in such allocation over the life span of a long-lived, non-masting tropical tree. We integrated rainfall and soil variables with data from 190 Bertholletia excelsa trees of different diameter at breast height (DBH) sizes, crown characteristics, and liana loads, quantifying BAI and reproductive output over 4 and 6 years, respectively. While rainfall explains BAI in all models, regardless of DBH class or ontogenic stage, light (based on canopy position and crown form) is most critical in the juvenile (5 cm ≤ DBH < 50 cm) phase. Suppressed trees are only present as juveniles and grow ten times slower (1.45 ± 2.73 m(2) year(-1)) than trees in dominant and co-dominant positions (13.25 ± 0.82 and 12.90 ± 1.35 m(2) year(-1), respectively). Additionally, few juvenile trees are reproductive, and those that are, demonstrate reduced growth, as do reproductive trees in the next 50 to 100 cm DBH class, suggesting growth-reproduction tradeoffs. Upon reaching the canopy, however, and attaining a sizeable girth, this pattern gradually shifts to one where BAI and reproduction are influenced independently by variables such as liana load, crown size and soil properties. At this stage, BAI is largely unaffected by fruit production levels. Thus, while growth-reproduction tradeoffs clearly exist during early life stages, effects of reproductive allocation diminish as B. excelsa increases in size and maturity.

Citing Articles

Habitat Quality Differentiation and Consequences for Ecosystem Service Provision of an Amazonian Hyperdominant Tree Species.

Thomas E, Jansen M, Chiriboga-Arroyo F, Wadt L, Corvera-Gomringer R, Atkinson R Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:621064.

PMID: 33868327 PMC: 8044455. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.621064.


Comparative models disentangle drivers of fruit production variability of an economically and ecologically important long-lived Amazonian tree.

Staudhammer C, Wadt L, Kainer K, da Cunha T Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):2563.

PMID: 33510254 PMC: 7843625. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81948-4.


Nut Production in Bertholletia excelsa across a Logged Forest Mosaic: Implications for Multiple Forest Use.

Rockwell C, Guariguata M, Menton M, Arroyo Quispe E, Quaedvlieg J, Warren-Thomas E PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0135464.

PMID: 26271042 PMC: 4536204. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135464.


Explaining biomass growth of tropical canopy trees: the importance of sapwood.

van der Sande M, Zuidema P, Sterck F Oecologia. 2015; 177(4):1145-55.

PMID: 25634307 PMC: 4363484. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3220-y.

References
1.
Knops J, Koenig W, Carmen W . Negative correlation does not imply a tradeoff between growth and reproduction in California oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(43):16982-5. PMC: 2040414. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704251104. View

2.
Poorter L, Kitajima K . Carbohydrate storage and light requirements of tropical moist and dry forest tree species. Ecology. 2007; 88(4):1000-11. DOI: 10.1890/06-0984. View

3.
Sanchez-Humanes B, Sork V, Espelta J . Trade-offs between vegetative growth and acorn production in Quercus lobata during a mast year: the relevance of crop size and hierarchical level within the canopy. Oecologia. 2010; 166(1):101-10. PMC: 3074067. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1819-6. View

4.
Newbery D, Chuyong G, Zimmermann L . Mast fruiting of large ectomycorrhizal African rain forest trees: importance of dry season intensity, and the resource-limitation hypothesis. New Phytol. 2006; 170(3):561-79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01691.x. View

5.
Vieira S, Trumbore S, Camargo P, Selhorst D, Chambers J, Higuchi N . Slow growth rates of Amazonian trees: consequences for carbon cycling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(51):18502-7. PMC: 1310511. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505966102. View