» Articles » PMID: 23403813

Spatial Genetic Analysis Reveals High Connectivity of Tiger (Panthera Tigris) Populations in the Satpura-Maikal Landscape of Central India

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2013 Feb 14
PMID 23403813
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the spatial genetic structure of the tiger meta-population in the Satpura-Maikal landscape of central India using population- and individual-based genetic clustering methods on multilocus genotypic data from 273 individuals. The Satpura-Maikal landscape is classified as a global-priority Tiger Conservation Landscape (TCL) due to its potential for providing sufficient habitat that will allow the long-term persistence of tigers. We found that the tiger meta-population in the Satpura-Maikal landscape has high genetic variation and very low genetic subdivision. Individual-based Bayesian clustering algorithms reveal two highly admixed genetic populations. We attribute this to forest connectivity and high gene flow in this landscape. However, deforestation, road widening, and mining may sever this connectivity, impede gene exchange, and further exacerbate the genetic division of tigers in central India.

Citing Articles

Genetic diversity analysis of Inner Mongolia cashmere goats (Erlangshan subtype) based on whole genome re-sequencing.

Wang R, Wang X, Qi Y, Li Y, Na Q, Yuan H BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):698.

PMID: 39014331 PMC: 11253418. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10485-x.


Genetic diversity and structure of mongolian gazelle (Procapra gutturosa) populations in fragmented habitats.

Shi L, Yang X, Cha M, Lyu T, Wang L, Zhou S BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):507.

PMID: 37648967 PMC: 10469424. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09574-0.


Connecting tiger () populations in Nepal: Identification of corridors among tiger-bearing protected areas.

Bhatt T, Castley J, Sims-Castley R, Baral H, Chauvenet A Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(5):e10140.

PMID: 37261321 PMC: 10227491. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10140.


Coincidence of low genetic diversity and increasing population size in wild gaur populations in the Khao Phaeng Ma Non-Hunting Area, Thailand: A challenge for conservation management under human-wildlife conflict.

Duengkae P, Ariyaraphong N, Tipkantha W, Jairak W, Baicharoen S, Nguyen D PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0273731.

PMID: 36040968 PMC: 9426942. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273731.


How methodological changes have influenced our understanding of population structure in threatened species: insights from tiger populations across India.

Aylward M, Sagar V, Natesh M, Ramakrishnan U Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1852):20200418.

PMID: 35430878 PMC: 9014192. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0418.


References
1.
Xu Y, Li B, Li W, Bai S, Jin Y, Li X . Individualization of tiger by using microsatellites. Forensic Sci Int. 2005; 151(1):45-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.07.003. View

2.
Kalinowski S . How well do evolutionary trees describe genetic relationships among populations?. Heredity (Edinb). 2009; 102(5):506-13. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2008.136. View

3.
Walston J, Robinson J, Bennett E, Breitenmoser U, da Fonseca G, Goodrich J . Bringing the tiger back from the brink-the six percent solution. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8(9). PMC: 2939024. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000485. View

4.
Luo S, Kim J, Johnson W, van der Walt J, Martenson J, Yuhki N . Phylogeography and genetic ancestry of tigers (Panthera tigris). PLoS Biol. 2004; 2(12):e442. PMC: 534810. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020442. View

5.
Shankaranarayanan P, Banerjee M, Kacker R, Aggarwal R, Singh L . Genetic variation in Asiatic lions and Indian tigers. Electrophoresis. 1997; 18(9):1693-700. DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150180938. View