» Articles » PMID: 23403319

Frequencies and Prognostic Impact of RAS Mutations in MLL-rearranged Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Infants

Overview
Journal Haematologica
Specialty Hematology
Date 2013 Feb 14
PMID 23403319
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants represents an aggressive malignancy associated with a high incidence (approx. 80%) of translocations involving the Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL) gene. Attempts to mimic Mixed Lineage Leukemia fusion driven leukemogenesis in mice raised the question whether these fusion proteins require secondary hits. RAS mutations are suggested as candidates. Earlier results on the incidence of RAS mutations in Mixed Lineage Leukemia-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia are inconclusive. Therefore, we studied frequencies and relation with clinical parameters of RAS mutations in a large cohort of infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Using conventional sequencing analysis, we screened neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog gene (NRAS), v-Ki-ras Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog gene (KRAS), and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 gene (BRAF) for mutations in a large cohort (n=109) of infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients and studied the mutations in relation to several clinical parameters, and in relation to Homeobox gene A9 expression and the presence of ALL1 fused gene 4-Mixed Lineage Leukemia (AF4-MLL). Mutations were detected in approximately 14% of all cases, with a higher frequency of approximately 24% in t(4;11)-positive patients (P=0.04). Furthermore, we identified RAS mutations as an independent predictor (P=0.019) for poor outcome in Mixed Lineage Leukemia-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia, with a hazard ratio of 3.194 (95% confidence interval (CI):1.211-8.429). Also, RAS-mutated infants have higher white blood cell counts at diagnosis (P=0.013), and are more resistant to glucocorticoids in vitro (P<0.05). Finally, we demonstrate that RAS mutations, and not the lack of Homeobox gene A9 expression nor the expression of AF4-MLL are associated with poor outcome in t(4;11)-rearranged infants. We conclude that the presence of RAS mutations in Mixed Lineage Leukemia-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia is an independent predictor for a poor outcome. Therefore, future risk-stratification based on abnormal RAS-pathway activation and RAS-pathway inhibition could be beneficial in RAS-mutated infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.

Citing Articles

Prediction of Response to FDA-Approved Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

Khawaji Z, Khawaji N, Alahmadi M, Elmoneim A Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024; 25(9):1163-1183.

PMID: 39102166 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01237-w.


Updates in Gene Rearrangement in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Gorecki M, Koziol I, Kopystecka A, Budzynska J, Zawitkowska J, Lejman M Biomedicines. 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36979800 PMC: 10045821. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11030821.


Real-Time Characterization of Clonal Fate Decisions in Complex Leukemia Samples by Fluorescent Genetic Barcoding.

Maetzig T, Lieske A, Dorpmund N, Rothe M, Kleppa M, Dziadek V Cells. 2022; 11(24).

PMID: 36552809 PMC: 9776743. DOI: 10.3390/cells11244045.


Duplex Sequencing Uncovers Recurrent Low-frequency Cancer-associated Mutations in Infant and Childhood -rearranged Acute Leukemia.

Pilheden M, Ahlgren L, Hyrenius-Wittsten A, Gonzalez-Pena V, Sturesson H, Hansen Marquart H Hemasphere. 2022; 6(10):e785.

PMID: 36204688 PMC: 9529062. DOI: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000785.


Decitabine mildly attenuates -rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia in vivo, and represents a poor chemo-sensitizer.

Schneider P, Castro P, Pinhancos S, Kerstjens M, van Roon E, Essing A EJHaem. 2022; 1(2):527-536.

PMID: 35844991 PMC: 9175850. DOI: 10.1002/jha2.81.


References
1.
Dordelmann M, Reiter A, Borkhardt A, Ludwig W, Gotz N, Viehmann S . Prednisone response is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1999; 94(4):1209-17. View

2.
Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash A . Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 30(1):207-10. PMC: 99122. DOI: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207. View

3.
Ravandi F, Cortes J, Jones D, Faderl S, Garcia-Manero G, Konopleva M . Phase I/II study of combination therapy with sorafenib, idarubicin, and cytarabine in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(11):1856-62. PMC: 2930809. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4888. View

4.
Lancet J, Duong V, Winton E, Stuart R, Burton M, Zhang S . A phase I clinical-pharmacodynamic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in advanced acute leukemias. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17(5):1140-6. PMC: 3049960. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1878. View

5.
Ramakers-Van Woerden N, Beverloo H, Veerman A, Camitta B, Loonen A, van Wering E . In vitro drug-resistance profile in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relation to age, MLL rearrangements and immunophenotype. Leukemia. 2004; 18(3):521-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403253. View