» Articles » PMID: 23401654

Further Analysis of the Lens of Ephrin-A5-/- Mice: Development of Postnatal Defects

Overview
Journal Mol Vis
Date 2013 Feb 13
PMID 23401654
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The cells of the mammalian lens must be carefully organized and regulated to maintain clarity. Recent studies have identified the Eph receptor ligand ephrin-A5 as a major contributor to lens development, as mice lacking ephrin-A5 develop abnormal lenses, resulting in cataracts. As a follow-up to our previous study on the cataracts observed in ephrin-A5(-/-) animals, we have further examined the morphological and molecular changes in the ephrin-A5(-/-) lens.

Methods: Wild-type and ephrin-A5(-/-) eyes at various ages were fixed, sectioned, and examined using histological techniques. Protein expression and localization were determined using immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis.

Results: Lens abnormalities in the ephrin-A5(-/-) animals are observed at postnatal stages, with lens opacity occurring by postnatal day 21. Structural defects in the lens are first observed in the outer lens fiber cell region where cells in the ephrin-A5(-/-) lens are severely disorganized. Ephrin-A5 and the Eph receptor EphA2 are expressed during early ocular development and continue to be expressed into postnatal stages. The cataracts in the ephrin-A5(-/-) mutants occur regardless of the presence of the CP49 mutation.

Conclusions: In this follow-up study, we have uncovered additional details explicating the mechanisms underlying ephrin-A5 function in the lens. Furthermore, elucidation of the expression of ephrin-A5 and the Eph receptor EphA2 in the lens supports a fundamental role for this receptor-ligand complex in lens development. These observations, in concert with our previous study, strongly suggest that ephrin-A5 has a critical role in postnatal lens fiber organization to maintain lens transparency.

Citing Articles

Canonical ligand-dependent and non-canonical ligand-independent EphA2 signaling in the eye lens of wild-type, knockout, and aging mice.

Horner J, Vu M, Clark J, Innis I, Cheng C Aging (Albany NY). 2024; 16(20):13039-13075.

PMID: 39466050 PMC: 11552635. DOI: 10.18632/aging.206144.


Deficiency of the bZIP transcription factors Mafg and Mafk causes misexpression of genes in distinct pathways and results in lens embryonic developmental defects.

Patel S, Anand D, Motohashi H, Katsuoka F, Yamamoto M, Lachke S Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:981893.

PMID: 36092713 PMC: 9459095. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.981893.


Roles of Eph-Ephrin Signaling in the Eye Lens Cataractogenesis, Biomechanics, and Homeostasis.

Murugan S, Cheng C Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:852236.

PMID: 35295853 PMC: 8918484. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.852236.


EphA2 Affects Development of the Eye Lens Nucleus and the Gradient of Refractive Index.

Cheng C, Wang K, Hoshino M, Uesugi K, Yagi N, Pierscionek B Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022; 63(1):2.

PMID: 34978559 PMC: 8742528. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.63.1.2.


Eph-ephrin Signaling Affects Eye Lens Fiber Cell Intracellular Voltage and Membrane Conductance.

Cheng C, Gao J, Sun X, Mathias R Front Physiol. 2021; 12:772276.

PMID: 34899394 PMC: 8656704. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.772276.


References
1.
Van Aken E, Papeleu P, De Potter P, De Laey J, Mareel M . Cadherin expression in the eye. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2002; (278):55-9. View

2.
Bassnett S . On the mechanism of organelle degradation in the vertebrate lens. Exp Eye Res. 2008; 88(2):133-9. PMC: 2693198. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.08.017. View

3.
Shi Y, De Maria A, Bennett T, Shiels A, Bassnett S . A role for epha2 in cell migration and refractive organization of the ocular lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 53(2):551-9. PMC: 3317406. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8568. View

4.
Grunwald I, Korte M, Adelmann G, Plueck A, Kullander K, Adams R . Hippocampal plasticity requires postsynaptic ephrinBs. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 7(1):33-40. DOI: 10.1038/nn1164. View

5.
Mathias R, Kistler J, Donaldson P . The lens circulation. J Membr Biol. 2007; 216(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00232-007-9019-y. View