» Articles » PMID: 23399513

Why Mobile Health App Overload Drives Us Crazy, and How to Restore the Sanity

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 Feb 13
PMID 23399513
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Smartphones and tablet computers have become an integral part of our lives. One of their key features is the possibility of installing third-party apps. These apps can be very helpful for improving health and healthcare. However, medical professionals and citizens are currently being overloaded with health apps. Consequently, they will have difficulty with finding the right app, and information and features are fragmented over too many apps, thereby limiting their usefulness.

Discussion: In order to combat health app overload, suppliers of apps need to do three things. One, join the open source movement, so that a few apps can work as gateway to medical information by incorporating information from different sources. Two, standardize content, so that the information provided via apps is readable. And third, in order to prevent information overload from occurring within an app, content should be personalized towards an individual's characteristics and context.

Summary: Suppliers of medical information and features need to join the open source movement and must make use of standardized medical information formats, in order to allow third parties to create valuable, mobile gateway apps. This can prevent the occurrence of health app overload. By going along in these trends, we can make health apps achieve the impact on healthcare quality and citizens' health many of us envision.

Citing Articles

The paradox of convenience: how information overload in mHealth apps leads to medical service overuse.

Zhong L, Cao J, Xue F Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1408998.

PMID: 39668954 PMC: 11634807. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1408998.


Feasibility and Acceptability of a Health App Platform Providing Individuals With a Budget to Purchase Preselected Apps to Work on Their Health and Well-Being: Quantitative Evaluation Study.

Willemsen R, Chavannes N, Aardoom J JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e51408.

PMID: 38809585 PMC: 11170047. DOI: 10.2196/51408.


The use of medical health applications by primary care physicians in Israel: a cross-sectional study.

Amran M, Bilitzky A, Bar-Yishay M, Adler L BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):410.

PMID: 38566059 PMC: 10988819. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10880-w.


A Health App Platform Providing a Budget to Purchase Preselected Apps as an Innovative Way to Support Public Health: Qualitative Study With End Users and Other Stakeholders.

Willemsen R, Meijer E, van den Berg L, van der Burg L, Chavannes N, Aardoom J JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e49473.

PMID: 37773608 PMC: 10576224. DOI: 10.2196/49473.


Standardization of the assessment process within telerehabilitation in chronic diseases: a scoping meta-review.

Chapel B, Alexandre F, Heraud N, Ologeanu-Taddei R, Cases A, Bughin F BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):984.

PMID: 35918690 PMC: 9344755. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08370-y.


References
1.
Reynolds C, Wyatt J . Open source, open standards, and health care information systems. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(1):e24. PMC: 3221346. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1521. View

2.
Prgomet M, Georgiou A, Westbrook J . The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physicians' work practices and patient care: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009; 16(6):792-801. PMC: 3002124. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3215. View

3.
Mosa A, Yoo I, Sheets L . A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12:67. PMC: 3534499. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-67. View

4.
Franko O, Tirrell T . Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst. 2011; 36(5):3135-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-011-9798-7. View

5.
van Velsen L, Beaujean D, Wentzel J, van Steenbergen J, van Gemert-Pijnen J . Developing requirements for a mobile app to support citizens in dealing with ticks and tick bites via end-user profiling. Health Informatics J. 2013; 21(1):24-35. DOI: 10.1177/1460458213496419. View