» Articles » PMID: 23398775

Australian Families Living with Rare Disease: Experiences of Diagnosis, Health Services Use and Needs for Psychosocial Support

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 Feb 13
PMID 23398775
Citations 118
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Families of children living with a rare disease report significant health and social burden, however, few studies have systematically examined family needs by using validated tools to assess the scope and extent of this burden. Our aim was to develop a comprehensive survey to assess health, psychosocial and financial impacts on Australian families caring for a child with a rare disease.

Methods: We developed a self-administered survey for parents/carers incorporating pre-validated tools. The survey included questions about experiences of diagnosis, health services use and needs, needs for peer and financial supports. Forty-seven families attending the state-wide Genetic Metabolic Disorders Service at the Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney were invited to participate.

Results: Of 46 families who received the survey, 30 (65%) completed it. Most (93%) found the survey acceptable and relevant (91%). Patients were 1-17 years old, 14 (47%) male, and 12 (40%) non-Caucasian. Eighteen (60%) had a lysosomal storage disease and 12(40%) had a mitochondrial disorder. Eleven (38%) saw 3-5 doctors and four (14%) saw 6-10 doctors before receiving the correct diagnosis; 43% felt diagnosis was delayed. Four (13%) were dissatisfied with the way diagnosis was given, due to insensitive style of communication, inadequate information and psychological support. Psychosocial impact was moderate to high for 90% of families and the level of impact was not dependent on the level of health functioning of the child. Twenty-six (87%) wanted, but only 13(43%) received, information about peer-support groups. The 30 children accounted for 168 visits to general practitioners and 260 visits to specialist doctors; 21 (70%) children had at least one admission to hospital, including one who had 16 admissions in the previous 12 months. Most families (77%) received financial assistance but 52% believed this was insufficient. Families benefited from a specialised multi-disciplinary clinic but called for patient-held electronic medical records.

Conclusions: Australian families caring for children with genetic metabolic disorders are adversely impacted by delays in diagnosis, lack of easy access to peer support groups and lack of psychological support. Further research is needed to estimate economic impact and to analyse health service delivery models for children with rare diseases in Australia.

Citing Articles

Management of rare and undiagnosed diseases: insights from researchers and healthcare professionals in Türkiye.

Durmus S, Yucesan E, Aktug S, Utz B, Caglayan A, Gencpinar P Front Public Health. 2025; 12:1501942.

PMID: 39911789 PMC: 11795313. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1501942.


Living with a child with MSUD: Psychosocial issues of Filipino parents with a child with maple syrup urine disease.

Tumulak M, Padilla C, Ongchangco J, Laurino M, Lagarde J, Regalado E Genet Med Open. 2024; 2:101847.

PMID: 39669607 PMC: 11613751. DOI: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101847.


A "rotating menu" of medical uncertainty for families affected by telomere biology disorders: A qualitative interview study.

Pearce E, Majid A, Brown T, Wilsnack C, Rising C, Thompson A SSM Qual Res Health. 2024; 6.

PMID: 39554689 PMC: 11563169. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100486.


Trust of inpatient physicians among parents of children with medical complexity: a qualitative study.

Dewan T, Whiteley A, MacKay L, Martens R, Noel M, Barnard C Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1443869.

PMID: 39398419 PMC: 11466756. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1443869.


The Association between Healthcare Satisfaction and Social Support and Stress, Depression, and Life Satisfaction in Female Caregivers: The Moderating Role of Dependence of a Sick Child.

Pavic J, Krznar M, cukljek S, Sedic B, Ozimec Vulinec S, Kovacevic I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(9).

PMID: 39338128 PMC: 11431563. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21091245.


References
1.
Stein R, Jessop D . The impact on family scale revisited: further psychometric data. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003; 24(1):9-16. View

2.
Snyder C, Aaronson N, Choucair A, Elliott T, Greenhalgh J, Halyard M . Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2011; 21(8):1305-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x. View

3.
Hennekam R . Care for patients with ultra-rare disorders. Eur J Med Genet. 2010; 54(3):220-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2010.12.001. View

4.
Zurynski Y, Frith K, Leonard H, Elliott E . Rare childhood diseases: how should we respond?. Arch Dis Child. 2008; 93(12):1071-4. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2007.134940. View

5.
Dossetor D, Liddle J, Mellis C . Measuring health outcome in paediatrics: development of the RAHC measure of function. J Paediatr Child Health. 1996; 32(6):519-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1996.tb00966.x. View