» Articles » PMID: 23393544

Factors Influencing the Utilisation of Antenatal Care Content in Uganda

Overview
Journal Australas Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 Feb 9
PMID 23393544
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Uganda records an inadequate utilisation of antenatal care programmes. The study set out to investigate the factors associated with the use of antenatal care content to inform policy makers of the pertinent factors that need to be influenced by policy.

Method: Data for the study was taken from a nationally representative Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (UDHS) 2006. The study employed both descriptive and community fixed effects approaches to examine the factors associated with the use of antenatal care content in Uganda.

Results: On average, only 16% of women used the full content of antenatal care. Only 12% of women had a urine sample taken, 28% a blood sample taken, and 53% their blood pressure measured. Almost two-thirds of women (63%) took iron supplements, 77% had their weight measured, and 27% were given drugs for intestinal parasites. The utilisation of the content of care was significantly associated with education of the mother and her partner, wealth status, location disparities, timing and frequency of antenatal visits, nature of facility visited, access to media, family planning, and utilisation of professional care.

Conclusion: Efforts are needed to educate girls beyond secondary level, establish village outreach clinics with qualified staff to attract the hard to reach women in the rural areas, and facilitate antenatal care utilisation irrespective of the ability to pay.

Citing Articles

Continuation of education after marriage and its relationship with professional maternal healthcare utilization among young adult women in Bangladesh.

Howlader S, Rahman M, Rahman M PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0316117.

PMID: 39739905 PMC: 11687904. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316117.


Determinants of quality antenatal care use in Kenya: Insights from the 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey.

Asiimwe J, Namulema A, Sserwanja Q, Kawuki J, Amperiize M, Amwiine E PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(9):e0003460.

PMID: 39298387 PMC: 11412633. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003460.


Utilization of maternal health care services among pastoralist communities in Marsabit County, Kenya: a cross-sectional survey.

Galgalo D, Mokaya P, Chauhan S, Kiptulon E, Wami G, Varnagy A Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):126.

PMID: 39223560 PMC: 11370096. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01865-3.


Contents of antenatal care services in Afghanistan: findings from the national health survey 2018.

Stanikzai M, Tawfiq E, Jafari M, Wasiq A, Seddiq M, Currie S BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):2469.

PMID: 38082286 PMC: 10712111. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17411-y.


Intimate partner violence and antenatal care utilization predictors in Uganda: an analysis applying Andersen's behavioral model of healthcare utilization.

Anguzu R, Walker R, Babikako H, Beyer K, Dickson-Gomez J, Zhou Y BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):2276.

PMID: 37978467 PMC: 10656909. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16827-w.


References
1.
Magadi M, Madise N, Rodrigues R . Frequency and timing of antenatal care in Kenya: explaining the variations between women of different communities. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51(4):551-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00495-5. View

2.
Mekonnen Y, Mekonnen A . Factors influencing the use of maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia. J Health Popul Nutr. 2004; 21(4):374-82. View

3.
Tann C, Kizza M, Morison L, Mabey D, Muwanga M, Grosskurth H . Use of antenatal services and delivery care in Entebbe, Uganda: a community survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007; 7:23. PMC: 2098779. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-23. View

4.
Parkhurst J, Ssengooba F . Assessing access barriers to maternal health care: measuring bypassing to identify health centre needs in rural Uganda. Health Policy Plan. 2009; 24(5):377-84. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czp023. View

5.
McDONALD T, Coburn A . Predictors of prenatal care utilization. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 27(2):167-72. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90325-5. View