» Articles » PMID: 23387316

Diagnostic Value of Circulating MicroRNAs for Lung Cancer: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2013 Feb 8
PMID 23387316
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality, and it shows a high incidence worldwide. Circulating microRNAs have been proposed as diagnostic indicators of lung cancer, but inconsistent results in the literature have prevented their widespread use in diagnosis. The present meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating microRNAs for lung cancer.

Methods: Several research databases were searched systematically for studies of the accuracy of circulating microRNAs as diagnostic indicators of lung cancer. Results from different studies were pooled using random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to assess the overall performance of microRNA-based assays.

Results: Thirteen publications were included in the meta-analysis. The following summary estimates were obtained for the performance of circulating microRNAs in lung cancer diagnosis: sensitivity, 0.85 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.83-0.87); specificity, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.86); positive likelihood ratio, 5.23 (95% CI: 3.75-7.29); negative likelihood ratio, 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.27); and diagnostic odds ratio, 31.77 (95% CI: 16.98-59.42). The SROC curve indicated a maximum joint sensitivity and specificity of 0.85, with an area under the curve of 0.92.

Conclusion: Circulating microRNAs show significant potential as diagnostic markers of lung cancer. The results of this meta-analysis justify larger, more rigorous studies to confirm such a diagnostic role.

Citing Articles

Serum Exosomes and Their miRNA Load-A Potential Biomarker of Lung Cancer.

Smolarz M, Widlak P Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(6).

PMID: 33803617 PMC: 8002857. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061373.


ZNF582 methylation as a potential biomarker to predict cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type III/worse: A meta-analysis of related studies in Chinese population.

Li N, He Y, Mi P, Hu Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(6):e14297.

PMID: 30732145 PMC: 6380660. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014297.


PAX1 and SOX1 methylation as an initial screening method for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis of individual studies in Asians.

Chen Y, Cui Z, Xiao Z, Hu M, Jiang C, Lin Y Ann Transl Med. 2016; 4(19):365.

PMID: 27826568 PMC: 5075846. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.09.30.


Long noncoding RNAs as auxiliary biomarkers for gastric cancer screening: A pooled analysis of individual studies.

Cui Z, Chen Y, Xiao Z, Hu M, Lin Y, Chen Y Oncotarget. 2016; 7(18):25791-800.

PMID: 27015554 PMC: 5041944. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8268.


Diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for breast cancer: a meta-analysis study.

Cui Z, Lin D, Song W, Chen M, Li D Tumour Biol. 2014; 36(2):829-39.

PMID: 25296735 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2700-8.


References
1.
Deeks J, Macaskill P, Irwig L . The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58(9):882-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016. View

2.
Leeflang M, Deeks J, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt P . Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149(12):889-97. PMC: 2956514. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008. View

3.
Whiting P, Weswood M, Rutjes A, Reitsma J, Bossuyt P, Kleijnen J . Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:9. PMC: 1421422. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-9. View

4.
Aberle D, Berg C, Black W, Church T, Fagerstrom R, Galen B . The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology. 2010; 258(1):243-53. PMC: 3009383. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091808. View

5.
Bishop J, Benjamin H, Cholakh H, Chajut A, Clark D, Westra W . Accurate classification of non-small cell lung carcinoma using a novel microRNA-based approach. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16(2):610-9. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2638. View