» Articles » PMID: 23373027

Doxofylline and Theophylline: a Comparative Clinical Study

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 Feb 2
PMID 23373027
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: COPD is one of the major public health problems worldwide. Theophylline has been used in the treatment of COPD for decades. Doxofylline a new theophylline congener has been claimed to have better safety profile. The study was undertaken to compare theophylline and doxophylline at doses recommended and commonly used in clinical practice.

Methods: The study was conducted in patients of COPD in TB chest department of a medical college hospital. It was randomized, prospective and open label. A total of 154 patients were divided in two group .Group I was administered 400 mg theophylline SR once daily and group II was administered doxofylline 400 mg twice a day orally. Spirometric variables symptom score, and adverse effects were recorded on day 0, 7 and 21 of therapy. Data were compared and analysed using SPSS version 16.

Results: Results of the study showed that there was no statistically significant difference with respect to spirometric variables and symptom score in the two groups and there was no significant difference in two groups with respect to side effects (p>0.05).

Conclusions: It is concluded that doxophylline has no advantage over theophylline in terms of either efficacy or safety on the doses commonly used in current clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Doxophylline With Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Case Report.

Yu D, Liu M, Tang W Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2024; 17:11795476241266395.

PMID: 39282243 PMC: 11402082. DOI: 10.1177/11795476241266395.


cAMP-PDE signaling in COPD: Review of cellular, molecular and clinical features.

Hasani Nourian Y, Salimian J, Ahmadi A, Salehi Z, Karimi M, Emamvirdizadeh A Biochem Biophys Rep. 2023; 34:101438.

PMID: 36865738 PMC: 9971187. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2023.101438.


Determination of the structural, electronic, optoelectronic and thermodynamic properties of the methylxanthine molecules theophylline and theobromine.

Ejuh G, Ndjaka J, Nya F, Ndukum P, Fonkem C, Assatse Y Opt Quantum Electron. 2020; 52(11):498.

PMID: 33162643 PMC: 7603795. DOI: 10.1007/s11082-020-02617-w.


Efficacy and safety profile of xanthines in COPD: a network meta-analysis.

Cazzola M, Calzetta L, Barnes P, Criner G, Martinez F, Papi A Eur Respir Rev. 2018; 27(148).

PMID: 29720510 PMC: 9488859. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0010-2018.


Doxofylline is not just another theophylline!.

Matera M, Page C, Cazzola M Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017; 12:3487-3493.

PMID: 29255355 PMC: 5723117. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S150887.

References
1.
Culpitt S, De Matos C, Russell R, Donnelly L, Rogers D, Barnes P . Effect of theophylline on induced sputum inflammatory indices and neutrophil chemotaxis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 165(10):1371-6. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2105106. View

2.
Halbert R, Natoli J, Gano A, Badamgarav E, Buist A, Mannino D . Global burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2006; 28(3):523-32. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00124605. View

3.
Dini F, Cogo R . Doxofylline: a new generation xanthine bronchodilator devoid of major cardiovascular adverse effects. Curr Med Res Opin. 2001; 16(4):258-68. DOI: 10.1185/030079901750120196. View

4.
Peleman R, Kips J, Pauwels R . Therapeutic activities of theophylline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998; 28 Suppl 3:53-6. View

5.
Barr R, Rowe B, Camargo Jr C . Methylxanthines for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2003; 327(7416):643. PMC: 196388. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7416.643. View