» Articles » PMID: 23371747

Concurrent Adaptation of Reactive Saccades and Hand Pointing Movements to Equal and to Opposite Changes of Target Direction

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Feb 2
PMID 23371747
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eye as well as hand movements can adapt to double-step target displacements, but it is still controversial whether both motor systems use common or distinct adaptive mechanisms. Here, we posit that analyses of the concurrent adaptation of both motor systems to equal versus different double-steps may provide more conclusive evidence than previous work about the transfer of adaptation from one motor system to the other. Forty subjects adapted to double-steps which called for a change of response direction. The same (group S) or the opposite change (group O) was required for eyes and hand. Group ON equaled O, except that no visual feedback of the hand was provided. Groups E and H served as controls for eyes-only and hand-only adaptation, respectively. We found no differences between groups or motor systems when comparing S, E and H. Adaptation was faster in O than in S, E and H, and faster still in ON. However, the magnitude of eye adaptation was much smaller in O and ON than in S, E and H. We conclude that concurrent adaptation of eye and hand directions to opposite double-steps attenuates recalibration which, at least for the hand, is largely replaced by workaround strategies. The mechanisms for eye and hand adaptation therefore seem to be coupled, in a way that hinders divergent recalibration of both motor systems. The possible neuronal substrate for our findings is discussed.

Citing Articles

Correlations between executive functions and adaptation to incrementally increasing sensorimotor discordances.

Schmitz G, Dierking M, Guenther A Exp Brain Res. 2018; 236(12):3417-3426.

PMID: 30298293 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5388-y.


Interference between adaptation to double steps and adaptation to rotated feedback in spite of differences in directional selectivity.

Schmitz G Exp Brain Res. 2016; 234(6):1491-504.

PMID: 26821312 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4559-y.


Effects of old age and resource demand on double-step adaptation of saccadic eye movements.

Bock O, Ilieva M, Grigorova V Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232(9):2821-6.

PMID: 24792506 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3969-y.

References
1.
Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Grethe J, Alexander G, Urquizar C, Prablanc C . Functional adaptation of reactive saccades in humans: a PET study. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 132(2):243-59. DOI: 10.1007/s002210000342. View

2.
Werner W . Neurons in the primate superior colliculus are active before and during arm movements to visual targets. Eur J Neurosci. 1993; 5(4):335-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1993.tb00501.x. View

3.
Girgenrath M, Bock O, Seitz R . An fMRI study of brain activation in a visual adaptation task: activation limited to sensory guidance. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 184(4):561-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1124-8. View

4.
Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Mcilroy W, Green R, Verrier M . The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 162(2):220-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2146-0. View

5.
Vercher J, Magenes G, Prablanc C, Gauthier G . Eye-head-hand coordination in pointing at visual targets: spatial and temporal analysis. Exp Brain Res. 1994; 99(3):507-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF00228987. View