» Articles » PMID: 23369016

Three-dimensional Assessment of Facial Appearance Following Surgical Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Overview
Date 2013 Feb 2
PMID 23369016
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: Objective assessment of postsurgical facial asymmetry can be difficult, but three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques have made this possible. The objective of this study was to assess residual asymmetry in surgically repaired unilateral cleft lip (UCL) and unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients and to compare this with noncleft controls.

Design: Retrospective multicohort comparative study.

Patients And Methods: Fifty-one 10-year-old children with surgically managed UCLP and 44 children with UCL were compared with a control group of 68 ten-year-olds. The 3D facial models at rest and with maximum smile were created using a 3D imaging system. Asymmetry scores were produced using both anatomical landmarks and a novel method of facial curve analysis.

Results: Asymmetry for the whole face was significantly higher in both cleft groups compared with controls (P < .001). UCLP asymmetry was higher than UCL (P < .001). In cleft patients, the upper lip and nasal rim were the most asymmetric (P < .001 to .05). Control subjects also displayed a degree of facial asymmetry. Maximum smile did not significantly affect the symmetry of the whole face, but it increased asymmetry of the vermillion border and nasal rim in all three groups (P < .001).

Conclusions: Despite surgical intervention at an early age, asymmetry remains significant in cleft patients at 10 years of age. Three-dimensional imaging is a noninvasive objective assessment tool that identifies specific areas of the face responsible for asymmetry. Facial curve analysis describes the face more comprehensively and characterizes soft tissue contours.

Citing Articles

Growth patterns of the nasolabial region following unilateral cleft lip primary repair.

Xu Y, Zeng N, Li J, Zheng Q, Shi B Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1136467.

PMID: 36994436 PMC: 10040551. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1136467.


Comparative clinical evaluation of modified and conventional Grayson's presurgical nasoalveolar molding technique in infants with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Thakur S, Jishad C, Singhal P, Chauhan D Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021; 18:68.

PMID: 34584646 PMC: 8428282.


Changes in the Transverse Dimension of the Maxillary Arch of 5-Year-Olds Born With UCLP Since the Introduction of Nationwide Guidance.

Molyneaux C, Sherriff M, Wren Y, Ireland A, Sandy J Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021; 59(8):1064-1071.

PMID: 34282648 PMC: 9272515. DOI: 10.1177/10556656211028511.


[Evaluation of the reproducibility of non-verbal facial expressions in normal persons using dynamic stereophotogrammetric system].

Qiu T, Liu X, Xue Z, Li Z Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020; 52(6):1107-1111.

PMID: 33331322 PMC: 7745277.


An Innovative Assessment of the Dynamics of Facial Movements in Surgically Managed Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using 4D Imaging.

Gattani S, Ju X, Gillgrass T, Bell A, Ayoub A Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020; 57(9):1125-1133.

PMID: 32419475 PMC: 7594373. DOI: 10.1177/1055665620924871.