» Articles » PMID: 23363454

Illness Perceptions in the Context of Differing Work Participation Outcomes: Exploring the Influence of Significant Others in Persistent Back Pain

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2013 Feb 1
PMID 23363454
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous research has demonstrated that the significant others of individuals with persistent back pain may have important influences on work participation outcomes. The aim of this study was to extend previous research by including individuals who have remained in work despite persistent back pain in addition to those who had become incapacitated for work, along with their significant others. The purpose of this research was to explore whether the illness beliefs of significant others differed depending on their relative's working status, and to make some preliminary identification of how significant others may facilitate or hinder work participation for those with persistent back pain.

Methods: Interviews structured around the Illness Perception Questionnaire (chronic pain version) were conducted with back pain patients recruited from a hospital pain management clinic along with their significant others. Some patients had remained in work despite their back pain; others had ceased employment. Data were analysed using template analysis.

Results: There were clear differences between beliefs about, and reported responses to, back pain symptoms amongst the significant others of individuals who had remained in employment compared with the significant others of those who had ceased work. Three overarching themes emerged: perceived consequences of back pain, specific nature of employment and the impact of back pain on patient identity.

Conclusions: Significant others of employed individuals with back pain focused on the extent to which activity could still be undertaken despite back pain symptoms. Individuals out of work due to persistent back pain apparently self-limited their activity and were supported in their beliefs and behaviours by their significant others. To justify incapacity due to back pain, this group had seemingly become entrenched in a position whereby it was crucial that the individual with back pain was perceived as completely disabled. We suggest that significant others are clearly important, and potentially detrimental, sources of support to individuals with back pain. The inclusion of significant others in vocational rehabilitation programmes could potentially be a valuable way of mobilising readily accessible resources in a way that supports optimal functioning.

Citing Articles

Screening for breast and cervical cancer among OST patients: a qualitative study of barriers and suggested interventions to increase participation.

Garpenhag L, Dahlman D Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023; 18(1):2175767.

PMID: 36756664 PMC: 9930823. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2175767.


The Associations Between Illness Perceptions and Expectations About Return to Work of Workers With Chronic Diseases and Their Significant Others: A Dyadic Analysis.

Snippen N, de Vries H, Roelen C, Brouwer S, Hagedoorn M J Occup Rehabil. 2022; 33(1):189-200.

PMID: 35978150 PMC: 10025207. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10062-7.


Digital Interventions Supporting Self-care in People With Type 2 Diabetes Across Greater Manchester (Greater Manchester Diabetes My Way): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Goldthorpe J, Allen T, Brooks J, Kontopantelis E, Holland F, Moss C JMIR Res Protoc. 2022; 11(8):e26237.

PMID: 35976184 PMC: 9434385. DOI: 10.2196/26237.


The work of return to work. Challenges of returning to work when you have chronic pain: a meta-ethnography.

Grant M, O-Beirne-Elliman J, Froud R, Underwood M, Seers K BMJ Open. 2019; 9(6):e025743.

PMID: 31227529 PMC: 6596973. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025743.


Influence of significant others on work participation of individuals with chronic diseases: a systematic review.

Snippen N, de Vries H, van der Burg-Vermeulen S, Hagedoorn M, Brouwer S BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1):e021742.

PMID: 30670501 PMC: 6347910. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021742.


References
1.
van Tulder M, Koes B, Bombardier C . Low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002; 16(5):761-75. DOI: 10.1053/berh.2002.0267. View

2.
Pincus T, Burton A, Vogel S, Field A . A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(5):E109-20. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017. View

3.
Main C, Foster N, Buchbinder R . How important are back pain beliefs and expectations for satisfactory recovery from back pain?. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24(2):205-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.12.012. View

4.
Cano A, Miller L, Loree A . Spouse beliefs about partner chronic pain. J Pain. 2009; 10(5):486-92. PMC: 2695943. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.11.005. View

5.
Leonard M, Cano A, Johansen A . Chronic pain in a couples context: a review and integration of theoretical models and empirical evidence. J Pain. 2006; 7(6):377-90. PMC: 1890016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.01.442. View