» Articles » PMID: 23361177

Cr(VI) Sorption by Free and Immobilised Chromate-reducing Bacterial Cells in PVA-alginate Matrix: Equilibrium Isotherms and Kinetic Studies

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Jan 31
PMID 23361177
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chromate-resistant bacterial strain isolated from the soil of tannery was studied for Cr(VI) bioaccumulation in free and immobilised cells to evaluate its applicability in chromium removal from aqueous solution. Based on the comparative analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, and phenotypic and biochemical characterization, this strain was identified as Paenibacillus xylanilyticus MR12. Mechanism of Cr adsorption was also ascertained by chemical modifications of the bacterial biomass followed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis of the cell wall constituents. The equilibrium biosorption analysed using isotherms (Langmuir, Freundlich and Dubinin-Redushkevich) and kinetics models (pseudo-first-order, second-order and Weber-Morris) revealed that the Langmuir model best correlated to experimental data, and Weber-Morris equation well described Cr(VI) biosorption kinetics. Polyvinyl alcohol alginate immobilised cells had the highest Cr(VI) removal efficiency than that of free cells and could also be reused four times for Cr(VI) removal. Complete reduction of chromate in simulated effluent containing Cu(2+), Mg(2+), Mn(2+) and Zn(2+) by immobilised cells, demonstrated potential applications of a novel immobilised bacterial strain MR12, as a vital bioresource in Cr(VI) bioremediation technology.

Citing Articles

Removal of Chromium Species by Adsorption: Fundamental Principles, Newly Developed Adsorbents and Future Perspectives.

Liu B, Xin Y, Zou J, Khoso F, Liu Y, Jiang X Molecules. 2023; 28(2).

PMID: 36677697 PMC: 9861687. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28020639.


Bacterial mechanisms for Cr(VI) resistance and reduction: an overview and recent advances.

Ahemad M Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2014; 59(4):321-32.

PMID: 24470188 DOI: 10.1007/s12223-014-0304-8.

References
1.
Romera E, Gonzalez F, Ballester A, Blazquez M, Munoz J . Comparative study of biosorption of heavy metals using different types of algae. Bioresour Technol. 2007; 98(17):3344-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.026. View

2.
Krishnani K, Meng X, Christodoulatos C, Boddu V . Biosorption mechanism of nine different heavy metals onto biomatrix from rice husk. J Hazard Mater. 2007; 153(3):1222-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.113. View

3.
Chang Y, Choi D, Kikuchi S . Enhanced extraction of heavy metals in the two-step process with the mixed culture of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 103(1):477-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.059. View

4.
Poopal A, Laxman R . Hexavalent chromate reduction by immobilized Streptomyces griseus. Biotechnol Lett. 2008; 30(6):1005-10. DOI: 10.1007/s10529-008-9662-0. View

5.
Zheng H, Liu D, Zheng Y, Liang S, Liu Z . Sorption isotherm and kinetic modeling of aniline on Cr-bentonite. J Hazard Mater. 2009; 167(1-3):141-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.093. View