» Articles » PMID: 23360373

Disparities in Attendance at Diabetes Self-management Education Programs After Diagnosis in Ontario, Canada: a Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2013 Jan 31
PMID 23360373
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patients newly-diagnosed with diabetes require self-management education to help them understand and manage the disease. The goals of the study were to determine the frequency of diabetes self-management education program utilization by newly-diagnosed patients, and to evaluate whether there were any demographic or clinical disparities in utilization.

Methods: Using population-level health care data, all 46,553 adults who were diagnosed with any type of non-gestational diabetes in Ontario, Canada between January and June 2006 were identified. They were linked with a diabetes self-management education program registry to identify those who attended within 6 months of diagnosis. The demographic and clinical characteristics of attendees and non-attendees were compared.

Results: A total of 9,568 (20.6%) patients attended a diabetes self-management education program within 6 months of diagnosis. Younger age, increasing socioeconomic status, and the absence of mental health conditions or other medical comorbidity were associated with attendance. Patients living in rural areas, where access to physicians may be limited, were markedly more likely to attend. Recent immigrants were 40% less likely to attend self-management education programs than longer-term immigrants or nonimmigrants.

Conclusion: Only one in five newly-diagnosed diabetes patients attended a diabetes self-management education program. Demographic and clinical disparities in utilization persisted despite a publicly-funded health care system where patients could access these services without direct charges. Primary care providers and education programs must ensure that more newly-diagnosed diabetes patients receive self-management education, particularly those who are older, poorer, sicker, or recent immigrants.

Citing Articles

Changes in Primary Care Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Analysis of Data From Ontario.

Ruangsomboon O, Zhong A, Kopp A, Elston B, Eldridge K, Lee S Healthc Policy. 2024; 19(4):42-54.

PMID: 39229662 PMC: 11411643. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27362.


Current evidence for designing self-management support for underserved populations: an integrative review using the example of diabetes.

Litchfield I, Barrett T, Hamilton-Shield J, Moore T, Narendran P, Redwood S Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1):188.

PMID: 37697302 PMC: 10496394. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01976-6.


The processes of engagement in information-seeking behavior for individuals with diabetes who developed diabetic foot ulcer: A constructivist grounded theory study.

Costa I, Camargo-Plazas P Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231177155.

PMID: 37361440 PMC: 10286200. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231177155.


Team-Based Diabetes Care in Ontario and Hong Kong: a Comparative Review.

Ke C, Mohammad E, Chan J, Kong A, Leung F, Shah B Curr Diab Rep. 2023; 23(7):135-146.

PMID: 37043089 PMC: 10091345. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-023-01508-0.


Socio-economic determinants of attendance at diabetes self-management education program: using Andersen's behavioral model.

Javan-Noughabi J, Tabatabaee S, Vahedi S, Sharifi T BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):1331.

PMID: 36352439 PMC: 9644561. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08749-x.


References
1.
Warsi A, Wang P, LaValley M, Avorn J, Solomon D . Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164(15):1641-9. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.15.1641. View

2.
Deakin T, McShane C, Cade J, Williams R . Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (2):CD003417. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003417.pub2. View

3.
Steele L, Glazier R, Lin E, Evans M . Using administrative data to measure ambulatory mental health service provision in primary care. Med Care. 2004; 42(10):960-5. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200410000-00004. View

4.
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View

5.
Beeney L, Bakry A, Dunn S . Patient psychological and information needs when the diagnosis is diabetes. Patient Educ Couns. 1996; 29(1):109-16. DOI: 10.1016/0738-3991(96)00939-1. View