» Articles » PMID: 23358846

Laparoscopic Versus Open Splenectomy and Esophagogastric Devascularization for Bleeding Varices or Severe Hypersplenism: a Comparative Study

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2013 Jan 30
PMID 23358846
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization are still uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare our results for laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization with those for open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization.

Materials And Methods: From January 2008 to December 2011, 153 patients were diagnosed with portal hypertension and serious gastroesophageal varices in our institute, among which, 107 patients also had repeated upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 85 had severe hypersplenism. Eighty patients chose laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization and 73 patients underwent the open procedure. Results and outcomes were compared retrospectively.

Results: Nine patients underwent conversion to laparotomy in the laparoscopic group. We compared the laparoscopic group (80 patients) and the open group (73 patients). Operating times and the frequencies of blood transfusions were similar. Blood loss was less (P = 0.044), the passing of flatus was earlier (P = 0.041), and hospital stays were shorter (P = 0.028) in the laparoscopic group. Portal vein system thrombosis after laparoscopy was more frequent (P = 0.012) but the rates of main trunk occlusion were similar between the two groups. Pleural effusion after laparoscopy was less (P = 0.021) and, apart from this, there was no difference in other morbidities between the two groups. During a postoperative follow-up period of 2 to 50 months in 80 patients of the laparoscopic group vs. 73 patients of the open group, the incidence of esophagogastric variceal rebleeding, encephalopathy, and secondary liver cancer showed no significant differences. And the mortality rates for each of the groups were not different.

Conclusions: The short-term effects of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization were better than those for open surgery, and the medium-term effects were similar between these two surgical approaches. Prospective randomized studies with a greater number of cases are needed to confirm the role of laparoscopy in splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization.

Citing Articles

Refractory massive chylothorax following robot-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy with pericardial devascularization treated with trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a case report.

Deng X, Xia J Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1420157.

PMID: 39296890 PMC: 11408172. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1420157.


Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy and gastropancreatic fold division: a less-invasive simplified technique of Hassab's procedure for refractory esophagogastric varices.

Iwasaki H, Ninomiya M, Itoh S, Takeishi K, Higashi H, Iseda N Surg Today. 2023; 54(7):807-811.

PMID: 38055105 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-023-02780-z.


Portal vein velocity predicts portal vein system thrombosis after splenectomy with esophagogastric devascularization.

Wang J, Li J, Wang W, Lv X, Zhu R, Yuan T Surg Endosc. 2023; 38(2):648-658.

PMID: 38012440 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10566-0.


Predictors of Long-Term Rebleeding Risk in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Esophagogastric Devascularization and Splenectomy: Impact of Portal Vein Thrombosis and Hemoglobin Levels.

Han J, Shu Q, Yi Y, Sun B Med Sci Monit. 2023; 29:e941153.

PMID: 37908069 PMC: 10921968. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.941153.


Comparison of long-term outcomes of splenectomy with periesophagogastric devascularization and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in treating cirrhotic portal hypertension patients with recurrent variceal bleeding.

Zhu W, Wang X, Lv Y, Chen H, Chen X, Li X Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):215.

PMID: 37247018 PMC: 10227160. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02933-1.


References
1.
Rattner D, Ellman L, Warshaw A . Portal vein thrombosis after elective splenectomy. An underappreciated, potentially lethal syndrome. Arch Surg. 1993; 128(5):565-9; discussion 569-70. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170101015. View

2.
Hong W, Zhu Q, Huang Z, Chen X, Jiang Z, Xu S . Predictors of esophageal varices in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis: a retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009; 9:11. PMC: 2661092. DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-11. View

3.
Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, Yasui M, Danno K, Fujie Y . Total splenic vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy: a possible candidate for treatment. Am J Surg. 2006; 193(1):21-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.036. View

4.
Yang Z, Qiu F . [Pericardial devascularization with splenectomy for the treatment of portal hypertension]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2002; 38(9):645-8. View

5.
Jensen D . Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhosis: findings, implications, and outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2002; 122(6):1620-30. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.33419. View