» Articles » PMID: 23354661

Top-down Modulation of Brain Activity Underlying Intentional Action and Its Relationship with Awareness of Intention: an ERP/Laplacian Analysis

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Jan 29
PMID 23354661
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intentional actions are executed with the peculiar experience of "I decide to do that." It has been proposed that intentional actions involve a specific brain network involving the supplementary motor areas (SMAs). Here, we manipulated the internal representation participants attended to (intention vs. movement) in order to (1) examine the activity of SMAs and of the primary motor cortex (M1) during intentional action preparation and execution, and (2) investigate the temporal relationship between activity in these structures and intention awareness. Participants performed self-paced key presses. After each key press, participants were asked to report either the time they had the first intention to press the key (W-condition) or the time they actually started the movement (M-condition). We then estimated surface Laplacians from brain electrical potentials recorded while participants were performing the task. Activity in SMAs was greater in the W-condition than in the M-condition more than 1 s before electromyographic (EMG) activation, suggesting that this region is indeed associated to the formation of conscious intention. Conversely, activity in primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the responding hand was larger in the M-condition than in the W-condition, revealing that this region is also modulated by top-down processes. In addition, waveforms time-locked to the W-judgement revealed that M1 as well as EMG activation preceded the time at which participants become aware of their intention by about 0.3 s. This observation argues against the possibility that the temporal delay between motor-related activation and intention awareness results from smearing artifacts.

Citing Articles

What is the intention to move and when does it occur?.

Triggiani A, Kreiman G, Lewis C, Maoz U, Mele A, Mudrik L Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023; 151:105199.

PMID: 37119992 PMC: 10330627. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105199.


Giving Up on Consciousness as the Ghost in the Machine.

Halligan P, Oakley D Front Psychol. 2021; 12:571460.

PMID: 33995166 PMC: 8121175. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.571460.


Ocular Dominance and Functional Asymmetry in Visual Attention Networks.

Liu S, Zhao B, Shi C, Ma X, Sabel B, Chen X Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021; 62(4):9.

PMID: 33825854 PMC: 8039471. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.62.4.9.


"Free won't" after a beer or two: chronic and acute effects of alcohol on neural and behavioral indices of intentional inhibition.

Liu Y, van den Wildenberg W, Fraga Gonzalez G, Rigoni D, Brass M, Wiers R BMC Psychol. 2020; 8(1):2.

PMID: 31910907 PMC: 6947965. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-019-0367-z.


Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials.

Guo H, Song H, Liu Y, Xu K, Shen H Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019; 12:701-714.

PMID: 31686926 PMC: 6709518. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S210910.


References
1.
Sirigu A, Daprati E, Ciancia S, Giraux P, Nighoghossian N, Posada A . Altered awareness of voluntary action after damage to the parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 7(1):80-4. DOI: 10.1038/nn1160. View

2.
Macar F, Vidal F, Casini L . The supplementary motor area in motor and sensory timing: evidence from slow brain potential changes. Exp Brain Res. 1999; 125(3):271-80. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050683. View

3.
Rigoni D, Kuhn S, Sartori G, Brass M . Inducing disbelief in free will alters brain correlates of preconscious motor preparation: the brain minds whether we believe in free will or not. Psychol Sci. 2011; 22(5):613-8. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611405680. View

4.
Haggard P, Eimer M . On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res. 1999; 126(1):128-33. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050722. View

5.
Roskies A . How does neuroscience affect our conception of volition?. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010; 33:109-30. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153151. View