» Articles » PMID: 23347346

Long-term Stability of Contour Augmentation with Early Implant Placement Following Single Tooth Extraction in the Esthetic Zone: a Prospective, Cross-sectional Study in 41 Patients with a 5- to 9-year Follow-up

Overview
Journal J Periodontol
Date 2013 Jan 26
PMID 23347346
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Early implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation is documented with short- and medium-term studies. The long-term stability of contour augmentation is uncertain.

Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, 41 patients with an implant-borne single crown were examined twice, in 2006 and 2010. Clinical, radiologic, and esthetic parameters were assessed at both examinations. In addition, a cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) image was obtained during the second examination to assess the dimensions of the facial bone wall.

Results: All 41 implants demonstrated ankylotic stability without signs of peri-implant infection at both examinations. The clinical parameters remained stable over time. Satisfactory esthetic outcomes were noted, as assessed by the pink and white esthetic score (PES/WES) indices. Overall, the PES scores were slightly higher than the WES scores. None of the implants developed mucosal recession over time, as confirmed by values of the distance between implant shoulder and mucosal margin and cast measurements. The periapical radiographs yielded stable peri-implant bone levels, with a mean distance between implant shoulder and first visible bone-implant contact value of 2.18 mm. The CBCT analysis demonstrated a mean thickness of the facial bone wall ≈2.2 mm. In two implants (4.9%) no facial bone wall was detectable radiographically.

Conclusions: This prospective cross-sectional study demonstrates stable peri-implant hard and soft tissues for all 41 implants examined and satisfactory esthetic outcomes overall. The follow-up of 5 to 9 years confirmed again that the risk for mucosal recession is low with early implant placement. In addition, contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration was able to establish and maintain a facial bone wall in 95% of patients.

Citing Articles

Prosthetic Soft Tissue Management in Esthetic Implant Restorations, Part I: Presurgical Planning, Implant Placement, and Restoration Timing. A Narrative Review.

Atri F, Nokar K Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(6):e900.

PMID: 39512086 PMC: 11544130. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.900.


CBCT in Dental Implantology: A Key Tool for Preventing Peri-Implantitis and Enhancing Patient Outcomes.

Hussaini S, Glogauer M, Sheikh Z, Al-Waeli H Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39056983 PMC: 11276053. DOI: 10.3390/dj12070196.


The influence of connective tissue grafting on the reconstruction of a missing facial bone wall using immediate implant placement and simultaneous bone reconstruction: a retrospective long-term cohort study.

Kuebler A, Noelken R Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):25.

PMID: 38760582 PMC: 11101404. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00533-2.


Early Implant Placement with Immediate Loading in the Mandibular Anterior Region: A Rapid Solution to Edentulism.

Rijal A, Dhami B, Ghimire P, Humagain M, Lamichhane S Case Rep Dent. 2023; 2023:8487094.

PMID: 38146421 PMC: 10749726. DOI: 10.1155/2023/8487094.


The fusion of keratinized epithelium, an indication of early implant placement in the aesthetic area: an animal study.

Ren C, Chen W, Chen J, Mao C, Liao C, Liu J BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):1016.

PMID: 38115040 PMC: 10729501. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03755-9.