» Articles » PMID: 23346474

Ubiquitous Health in Korea: Progress, Barriers, and Prospects

Overview
Date 2013 Jan 25
PMID 23346474
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Korea has one of the most advanced information technology (IT) infrastructures in the world, and the application of IT in health systems is rapidly progressing from computerization to information systems, ubiquitous systems, and smart systems. This study aims to analyze Korean environments in regards to the development of their u-Health industry and propose directions for u-Healthcare services based on this analysis.

Methods: This paper reviews the background, progress history, and current status of u-Health in Korea, and suggests strategies for the u-Health industry based on an analysis of its barriers and obstacles.

Results: When u-Health was introduced to Koreans, their policies and approaches focused mainly on environmental factors, yet these efforts have not progressed further to impact the u-Healthcare service industry itself. To develop the u-Healthcare industry, four points need to be considered: the development and support of the practical service model, institutional support, support of core technology and industry, and the institutionalization of health management service.

Conclusions: Korea is at a strategic point to start building u-Healthcare service delivery models. u-Healthcare is a healthcare service that provides added value through u-Health environments. By identifying critical success factors in u-Healthcare, we can strengthen the u-Health industry and implement policies to coordinate our efforts in the process of value chains to which we belong.

Citing Articles

Self-management of Chronic Conditions Using mHealth Interventions in Korea: A Systematic Review.

Yi J, Kim Y, Cho Y, Kim H Healthc Inform Res. 2018; 24(3):187-197.

PMID: 30109152 PMC: 6085202. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2018.24.3.187.


Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications Developed by a Tertiary Hospital as a Tool for Quality Improvement Breakthrough.

Lee Y, Shin S, Kim J, Kim J, Seo D, Joo S Healthc Inform Res. 2015; 21(4):299-306.

PMID: 26618037 PMC: 4659888. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.299.


Technology Acceptance and Adoption of Innovative Smartphone Uses among Hospital Employees.

Moon B, Chang H Healthc Inform Res. 2014; 20(4):304-12.

PMID: 25405067 PMC: 4231181. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2014.20.4.304.


mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework.

Labrique A, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R, Mehl G Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014; 1(2):160-71.

PMID: 25276529 PMC: 4168567. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031.


Factors affecting electronic medical record system adoption in small korean hospitals.

Park Y, Lee J Healthc Inform Res. 2014; 20(3):183-90.

PMID: 25152831 PMC: 4141132. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2014.20.3.183.


References
1.
Lehoux P . Why examining the desirability of health technology matters. Healthc Policy. 2009; 3(3):29-39. PMC: 2645152. View

2.
Anderson J . Social, ethical and legal barriers to e-health. Int J Med Inform. 2006; 76(5-6):480-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.016. View

3.
Jeong H, Shin J . Trends in scale and structure of Korea's health expenditure over last three decades (1980-2009): financing, functions and providers. J Korean Med Sci. 2012; 27 Suppl:S13-20. PMC: 3360167. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.S.S13. View

4.
Johnston B, Wheeler L, Deuser J, Sousa K . Outcomes of the Kaiser Permanente Tele-Home Health Research Project. Arch Fam Med. 2000; 9(1):40-5. DOI: 10.1001/archfami.9.1.40. View

5.
Song T, Ryu S, Lee S . U-health service for managing chronic disease: a case study on managing metabolic syndrome in a health center in South Korea. Healthc Inform Res. 2012; 17(4):260-6. PMC: 3259561. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2011.17.4.260. View