» Articles » PMID: 23337364

Cost of Behavioral Interventions Utilizing Electronic Drug Monitoring for Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence

Overview
Date 2013 Jan 23
PMID 23337364
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To provide data on the actual costs associated with behavioral ART adherence interventions and electronic drug monitoring used in a clinical trial to inform their implementation in future studies and real-world practice.

Methods: Direct and time costs were calculated from a multisite 3-arm randomized controlled ART adherence trial. HIV-positive participants (n = 204) were randomized to standard care, enhanced counseling (EC), or EC and modified directly observed therapy (mDOT) interventions. Electronic drug monitoring (EDM) was used. Costs were calculated for various components of the 24-week adherence intervention. This economic evaluation was conducted from the perspective of an agency that may wish to implement these strategies. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine costs and savings associated with different scenarios.

Results: Total direct costs were $126,068 ($618 per patient). Initial time costs were $53,590 ($262 per patient). Base cost of labor was $0.36/min. EC costs for 134 patients were $18,427 ($137 per patient) and mDOT for 64 patients cost $18,638 ($291 per patient). Total per patient costs were as follows: standard care = $880, EC = $1018, EC/mDOT = $1309. Removing driving costs evidenced the most variable impact on savings between the 3 study arms. The tornado diagram (sensitivity analysis) showed a graphical representation of how each sensitivity assumption reduced costs compared with each other and the resulting comparative costs for each group.

Conclusions: This novel economic analysis provides valuable cost information to guide treatment implementation and research design decisions.

Citing Articles

Motivational Interviewing to Encourage Quit Attempts Among Smokers Not Ready to Quit: A Trial-Based Economic Analysis.

Rasu R, Thelen J, Bawa W, Goggin K, Bradley-Ewing A, Catley D Nicotine Tob Res. 2019; 22(9):1515-1523.

PMID: 31820002 PMC: 7443585. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz228.


Challenges in the Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Engagement Along the HIV Care Continuum in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Risher K, Kapoor S, Daramola A, Paz-Bailey G, Skarbinski J, Doyle K AIDS Behav. 2017; 21(7):2101-2123.

PMID: 28120257 PMC: 5843766. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-017-1687-8.


Commentary: demonstrating cost-effectiveness in pediatric psychology.

McGrady M J Pediatr Psychol. 2014; 39(6):602-11.

PMID: 24752732 PMC: 4061600. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu019.


A randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of motivational counseling with observed therapy for antiretroviral therapy adherence.

Goggin K, Gerkovich M, Williams K, Banderas J, Catley D, Berkley-Patton J AIDS Behav. 2013; 17(6):1992-2001.

PMID: 23568228 PMC: 3672512. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-013-0467-3.

References
1.
Rasu R, Hunter C, Peterson A, Maruska H, Foreyt J . Economic evaluation of an Internet-based weight management program. Am J Manag Care. 2010; 16(4):e98-104. View

2.
Diiorio C, McCarty F, Resnicow K, McDonnell Holstad M, Soet J, Yeager K . Using motivational interviewing to promote adherence to antiretroviral medications: a randomized controlled study. AIDS Care. 2008; 20(3):273-83. PMC: 3103182. DOI: 10.1080/09540120701593489. View

3.
Race E, Dam E, Obry V, Paulous S, Clavel F . Analysis of HIV cross-resistance to protease inhibitors using a rapid single-cycle recombinant virus assay for patients failing on combination therapies. AIDS. 1999; 13(15):2061-8. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199910220-00008. View

4.
Sethi A . Adherence and HIV drug resistance. HIV Clin Trials. 2004; 5(2):112-5. DOI: 10.1310/N53E-1930-NJMW-GL7C. View

5.
Tilghman M, May S, Perez-Santiago J, Ignacio C, Little S, Richman D . A combined screening platform for HIV treatment failure and resistance. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e35401. PMC: 3338506. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035401. View