» Articles » PMID: 23335950

(v) Simulation and Measurement of Wear in Metal-on-metal Bearings In vitro- Understanding the Reasons for Increased Wear

Overview
Journal Orthop Trauma
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Jan 22
PMID 23335950
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A new Stratified Approach For Enhanced Reliability (SAFER) pre-clinical simulation testing of joint prostheses has been described in a preceding paper in this volume. The application of SAFER in vitro simulation and testing to metal-on-metal bearings is described in this review paper. The review aims to provide further understanding of the reasons for, and causes of, increased wear in metal-on-metal hips in a proportion of patients. Variation in positioning (mal-positioning) of the head and cup in hip prostheses results in the head contacting the rim of the cup and producing increased wear. Variation in both translational and rotational positioning has been investigated. Variation in translational positioning of the centres of the head and cup, which is not detected on radiographs, is a frequent occurrence clinically and can result in a substantial increase in wear rate. The variation in translational positioning acts synergistically with variation in rotational positioning to produce substantial increases in wear. These recent findings are consistent with the wear mechanisms and formation of stripe wear reported for ceramic-on-ceramic bearings over a decade ago, and provide insight into the reasons for the variation and increases in the wear rate found clinically in metal-on-metal hips in specific patients, which may cause premature failure.

Citing Articles

Importance of preclinical evaluation of wear in hip implant designs using simulator machines.

Trommer R, Maru M Rev Bras Ortop. 2017; 52(3):251-259.

PMID: 28702381 PMC: 5496994. DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.07.004.


Detection of incorrect manufacturer labelling of hip components.

Durand-Hill M, Henckel J, Burwell M, Skinner J, Hart A Skeletal Radiol. 2016; 46(1):105-109.

PMID: 27660231 PMC: 5121176. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-016-2478-4.

References
1.
Morlock M, Bishop N, Zustin J, Hahn M, Ruther W, Amling M . Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90 Suppl 3:89-95. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00621. View

2.
Hu X, Isaac G, Fisher J . Changes in the contact area during the bedding-in wear of different sizes of metal on metal hip prostheses. Biomed Mater Eng. 2004; 14(2):145-9. View

3.
Nevelos J, Prudhommeaux F, Hamadouche M, Doyle C, Ingham E, Meunier A . Comparative analysis of two different types of alumina-alumina hip prosthesis retrieved for aseptic loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83(4):598-603. View

4.
de Haan R, Campbell P, Su E, De Smet K . Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(9):1158-63. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.19891. View

5.
Nevelos J, Ingham E, Doyle C, Nevelos A, Fisher J . The influence of acetabular cup angle on the wear of "BIOLOX Forte" alumina ceramic bearing couples in a hip joint simulator. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004; 12(2):141-4. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008970027306. View