» Articles » PMID: 23335621

Lower-limb Drainage Mapping for Lymphedema Risk Reduction After Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Jan 22
PMID 23335621
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Pelvic lymphadenectomy is associated with a significant risk of lower-limb lymphedema. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated the feasibility of identifying the lower-limb drainage nodes (LLDNs) during pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Secondary objectives were to map lower-limb drainage and to assess the diagnostic value of our mapping technique.

Methods: This prospective study included patients with endometrial cancer requiring pelvic lymphadenectomy, without neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy and without history of lower-limb surgery. A radiopharmaceutical was injected into both feet on the day before surgery. LLDNs were identified using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative isotopic probe detection, then removed before complete pelvic lymphadenectomy. LLDNs and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens underwent separate histological analysis.

Results: Of the 12 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, 10 underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, which consistently identified inguinal, femoral, and pelvic LLDNs (detection rate: 100%). The intraoperative detection rate was 83% (10/12). Median number of hot nodes per patient was 5 nodes (range: 3-7) on the right and 3 nodes (range: 2-6) on the left. Of 107 LLDNs, 106 were in the external iliac area, including 38 in the lateral group and 45 in the intermediate and medial groups. None of the patients had node metastases at any site. No early complications related to the technique occurred.

Conclusion: Our mapping technique appears feasible, safe, and associated with a high LLDN identification rate. LLDN mapping may allow the preservation of LLDNs, thereby decreasing the risk of lower-limb lymphedema and improving quality of life.

Citing Articles

Extent of lymphadenectomy and postoperative major complications among women with endometrial cancer treated with minimally invasive surgery.

Polan R, Rossi E, Barber E Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 220(3):263.e1-263.e8.

PMID: 30521798 PMC: 11388052. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1102.

References
1.
Caubel P, Balladur A, Foulques H, Zamora A, Lefranc J, Blondon J . [Value of non-reperitonization for preventing lymphocele after extended lymphadeno-colpo-hysterectomy. Our experience in a comparative retrospective series of 124 cases]. Ann Chir. 1989; 43(7):525-9. View

2.
Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, Watari H, Takeda M, Sakuragi N . Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010; 375(9721):1165-72. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62002-X. View

3.
May K, Bryant A, Dickinson H, Kehoe S, Morrison J . Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (1):CD007585. PMC: 4171003. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007585.pub2. View

4.
Ballester M, Dubernard G, Lecuru F, Heitz D, Mathevet P, Marret H . Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(5):469-76. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70070-5. View

5.
Abu-Rustum N, Barakat R . Observations on the role of circumflex iliac node resection and the etiology of lower extremity lymphedema following pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 106(1):4-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.026. View