» Articles » PMID: 23333260

Detection of Acoustic Temporal Fine Structure by Cochlear Implant Listeners: Behavioral Results and Computational Modeling

Overview
Journal Hear Res
Date 2013 Jan 22
PMID 23333260
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A test of within-channel detection of acoustic temporal fine structure (aTFS) cues is presented. Eight cochlear implant listeners (CI) were asked to discriminate between two Schroeder-phase (SP) complexes using a two-alternative, forced-choice task. Because differences between the acoustic stimuli are primarily constrained to their aTFS, successful discrimination reflects a combination of the subjects' perception of and the strategy's ability to deliver aTFS cues. Subjects were mapped with single-channel Continuous Interleaved Sampling (CIS) and Simultaneous Analog Stimulation (SAS) strategies. To compare within- and across- channel delivery of aTFS cues, a 16-channel clinical HiRes strategy was also fitted. Throughout testing, SAS consistently outperformed the CIS strategy (p ≤ 0.002). For SP stimuli with F0 = 50 Hz, the highest discrimination scores were achieved with the HiRes encoding, followed by scores with the SAS and the CIS strategies, respectively. At 200 Hz, single-channel SAS performed better than HiRes (p = 0.022), demonstrating that under a more challenging testing condition, discrimination performance with a single-channel analog encoding can exceed that of a 16-channel pulsatile strategy. To better understand the intermediate steps of discrimination, a biophysical model was used to examine the neural discharges evoked by the SP stimuli. Discrimination estimates calculated from simulated neural responses successfully tracked the behavioral performance trends of single-channel CI listeners.

Citing Articles

Corrective binaural processing for bilateral cochlear implant patients.

Brown C PLoS One. 2018; 13(1):e0187965.

PMID: 29351279 PMC: 5774684. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187965.


Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.

Won J, Moon I, Jin S, Park H, Woo J, Cho Y PLoS One. 2015; 10(10):e0140920.

PMID: 26485715 PMC: 4617902. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140920.


Perception of pure tones and iterated rippled noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant users.

Penninger R, Chien W, Jiradejvong P, Boeke E, Carver C, Limb C Trends Amplif. 2013; 17(1):45-53.

PMID: 23539260 PMC: 4040863. DOI: 10.1177/1084713813482759.

References
1.
RUSHTON W . A theory of the effects of fibre size in medullated nerve. J Physiol. 1951; 115(1):101-22. PMC: 1392008. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004655. View

2.
Qin M, Oxenham A . Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 114(1):446-54. DOI: 10.1121/1.1579009. View

3.
Runge-Samuelson C, Abbas P, Rubinstein J, Miller C, Robinson B . Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains. Hear Res. 2004; 194(1-2):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.03.020. View

4.
Hopkins K, Moore B, Stone M . Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 123(2):1140-53. PMC: 2688774. DOI: 10.1121/1.2824018. View

5.
Drennan W, Won J, Nie K, Jameyson E, Rubinstein J . Sensitivity of psychophysical measures to signal processor modifications in cochlear implant users. Hear Res. 2010; 262(1-2):1-8. PMC: 2864608. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.003. View