» Articles » PMID: 23332118

Visual Outcomes and Subjective Experience After Bilateral Implantation of a New Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2013 Jan 22
PMID 23332118
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

Setting: Midland Eye Institute, Solihull, United Kingdom.

Design: Cohort study.

Methods: Patients had bilateral implantation of Finevision trifocal IOLs. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and manifest refraction were measured 2 months postoperatively. Defocus curves were assessed under photopic and mesopic conditions over a range of +1.50 to -4.00 diopters (D) in 0.50 D steps. Contrast sensitivity function was assessed under photopic conditions. Halometry was used to measure the angular size of monocular and binocular photopic scotomas arising from a glare source. Patient satisfaction with uncorrected near vision was assessed using the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ).

Results: The mean monocular CDVA was 0.08 logMAR ± 0.08 (SD) and the mean binocular CDVA, 0.06 ± 0.08 logMAR. Defocus curve testing showed an extended range of clear vision from +1.00 to -2.50 D defocus, with a significant difference in acuity between photopic conditions and mesopic conditions at -1.50 D defocus only. Photopic contrast sensitivity was significantly better binocularly than monocularly at all spatial frequencies. Halometry showed a glare scotoma of a mean size similar to that in previous studies of multifocal and accommodating IOLs; there were no subjective complaints of dysphotopsia. The mean NAVQ Rasch score for satisfaction with near vision was 15.9 ± 10.7 logits.

Conclusions: The trifocal IOL implanted binocularly produced good distance visual acuity and near and intermediate visual function. Patients were very satisfied with their uncorrected near vision.

Citing Articles

Three Patient-Reported Outcomes Questionnaires in Japanese Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery with Trifocal IOL Implantation.

Akahoshi T Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:2521-2529.

PMID: 39246556 PMC: 11380849. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S478292.


Systematic bibliometric analysis of research hotspots and trends on the application of premium IOLs in the past 2 decades.

Li L, Yuan L, Mao D, Hua X, Yuan X Int J Ophthalmol. 2024; 17(4):736-747.

PMID: 38638264 PMC: 10988063. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.04.19.


Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.

La Cruz D, Bartlett J, Gutierrez M, Ng S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 1:CD012648.

PMID: 36705482 PMC: 9881452. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub3.


Evaluation of Postoperative Total Ocular Aberrations After Bilateral Implantation of Monofocal IOL with Extended Depth of Focus in Phacoemulsification.

Abd Elghaffar Shehata M, Hosny M, Tolba D, Attya M Clin Ophthalmol. 2022; 16:4257-4261.

PMID: 36575683 PMC: 9790161. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S391355.


Difference in Quality of Vision Outcome among Extended Depth of Focus, Bifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.

Chao C, Lin H, Lee C, Mai E, Lian I, Chang C Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(6).

PMID: 35742051 PMC: 9223205. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061000.