» Articles » PMID: 23329151

Urgent Surgery Compared with Fibrinolytic Therapy for the Treatment of Left-sided Prosthetic Heart Valve Thrombosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

Overview
Journal Eur Heart J
Date 2013 Jan 19
PMID 23329151
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) occurs frequently in developing countries and causes major morbidity and mortality. Fibrinolytic therapy (FT) is most commonly used as treatment, but increases the risk of stroke and bleeding. Urgent surgery may be more efficacious and cause fewer complications. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of urgent surgery and FT for the treatment of left-sided PVT.

Methods And Results: We searched EMBASE and MEDLINE for articles which included at least five patients each treated with surgery and FT. The primary outcome was complete restoration of valve function. Other outcomes were in-hospital death, thrombo-embolism (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, or non-CNS systemic embolism), major bleeding, and recurrence of PVT on follow-up. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for each outcome and pooled them using a random effects model. We included seven eligible studies with 690 episodes of PVT, 446 treated with surgery, and 244 with FT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of the primary outcome (86.5 vs. 69.7%, OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.94-6.78, P = 0.066, I(2) = 74%) or death (13.5 vs. 9%, OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.63-5.98, P = 0.244, I(2) = 59%) between the two treatments. However, compared with FT, urgent surgery was associated with significant reductions in thrombo-embolism (1.6 vs. 16%, OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.24, P < 0.001, I(2) = 0%), major bleeding (1.4 vs. 5%; OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.98, P = 0.046, I(2) = 0%), and recurrent PVT (7.1 vs. 25.4%; OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.74, P = 0.013, I(2) = 59%).

Conclusion: Urgent surgery was not superior to FT at restoring valve function, but substantially reduced the occurrence of thrombo-embolic events, major bleeding, and recurrent PVT. In experienced centres, urgent surgery should probably be preferred over FT for treating left-sided PVT, pending the results of randomized controlled trials.

Citing Articles

Thrombosed Mechanical Aortic Valve Treated with Low-Dose Ultraslow Alteplase Infusion.

Pavlatos N, Daga P, Shah A, Khan M, Mattumpuram J Medicines (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39982323 PMC: 11843830. DOI: 10.3390/medicines12010003.


Acute Decompensated Valvular Disease in the Intensive Care Unit.

Miller P, Senman B, Gage A, Carnicelli A, Jacobs M, Rali A JACC Adv. 2024; 3(12):101402.

PMID: 39735779 PMC: 11681797. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101402.


Surgery Versus Thrombolytic Therapy for the Management of Left-Sided Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis Without Hemodynamic Compromise: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chopard R, Vidoni C, Besutti M, Ismail M, Ecarnot F, Favoulet B J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(19):e035143.

PMID: 39291476 PMC: 11681445. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035143.


Surgery compared to fibrinolytic therapy for symptomatic left-sided prosthetic heart valve thrombosis (SAFE-PVT): Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial.

Devasenapathy N, Devagourou V, Hote M, Rajashekar P, Kidambi B, Singal A Indian Heart J. 2024; 76(3):192-196.

PMID: 38879396 PMC: 11329034. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2024.06.013.


Thrombolytic therapy after cardiac arrest in patients with mechanical aortic valve thrombosis.

Asada K, Saito Y, Kobayashi Y J Cardiol Cases. 2024; 29(3):112-115.

PMID: 38481643 PMC: 10927457. DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2023.11.007.