» Articles » PMID: 23328585

Earlier Detection of Breast Cancer with Ultrasound Molecular Imaging in a Transgenic Mouse Model

Overview
Journal Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Jan 19
PMID 23328585
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While there is an increasing role of ultrasound for breast cancer screening in patients with dense breast, conventional anatomical ultrasound lacks sensitivity and specificity for early breast cancer detection. In this study, we assessed the potential of ultrasound molecular imaging using clinically translatable vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 (VEGFR2)-targeted microbubbles (MB(VEGFR2)) to improve the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in earlier detection of breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in a transgenic mouse model [FVB/N-Tg(MMTV-PyMT)634Mul]. In vivo binding specificity studies (n = 26 tumors) showed that ultrasound imaging signal was significantly higher (P < 0.001) using MB(VEGFR2) than nontargeted microbubbles and imaging signal significantly decreased (P < 0.001) by blocking antibodies. Ultrasound molecular imaging signal significantly increased (P < 0.001) when breast tissue (n = 315 glands) progressed from normal [1.65 ± 0.17 arbitrary units (a.u.)] to hyperplasia (4.21 ± 1.16), DCIS (15.95 ± 1.31), and invasive cancer (78.1 ± 6.31) and highly correlated with ex vivo VEGFR2 expression [R(2) = 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.91; P < 0.001]. At an imaging signal threshold of 4.6 a.u., ultrasound molecular imaging differentiated benign from malignant entities with a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 78-88) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 81-94). In a prospective screening trail (n = 63 glands), diagnostic performance of detecting DCIS and breast cancer was assessed and two independent readers correctly diagnosed malignant disease in more than 95% of cases and highly agreed between each other [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.98; 95% CI, 97-99]. These results suggest that VEGFR2-targeted ultrasound molecular imaging allows highly accurate detection of DCIS and breast cancer in transgenic mice and may be a promising approach for early breast cancer detection in women.

Citing Articles

Acoustic Molecular Imaging Beyond the Diffraction Limit In Vivo.

Kierski T, Walmer R, Tsuruta J, Yin J, Cherin E, Foster F IEEE Open J Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2023; 2:237-249.

PMID: 38125957 PMC: 10732349. DOI: 10.1109/ojuffc.2022.3212342.


VEGFR2 targeted microbubble-based ultrasound molecular imaging improving the diagnostic sensitivity of microinvasive cervical cancer.

Zhong J, Su M, Jiang Y, Huang L, Chen Y, Huang Z J Nanobiotechnology. 2023; 21(1):220.

PMID: 37438780 PMC: 10337210. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-023-01984-2.


Non-Invasive Imaging Modalities in Intravesical Murine Models of Bladder Cancer.

Relouw S, Dugbartey G, Sener A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(8).

PMID: 37190309 PMC: 10137013. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082381.


Applications of Computational Methods in Biomedical Breast Cancer Imaging Diagnostics: A Review.

Aruleba K, Obaido G, Ogbuokiri B, Fadaka A, Klein A, Adekiya T J Imaging. 2021; 6(10).

PMID: 34460546 PMC: 8321173. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging6100105.


Dynamic Filtering of Adherent and Non-adherent Microbubble Signals Using Singular Value Thresholding and Normalized Singular Spectrum Area Techniques.

Herbst E, Klibanov A, Hossack J, Mauldin Jr F Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021; 47(11):3240-3252.

PMID: 34376299 PMC: 8691388. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.06.019.


References
1.
Crystal P, Strano S, Shcharynski S, Koretz M . Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181(1):177-82. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.1.1810177. View

2.
Youk J, Kim E . Supplementary screening sonography in mammographically dense breast: pros and cons. Korean J Radiol. 2010; 11(6):589-93. PMC: 2974219. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.6.589. View

3.
Hicklin D, Ellis L . Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 23(5):1011-27. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.081. View

4.
Bzyl J, Lederle W, Rix A, Grouls C, Tardy I, Pochon S . Molecular and functional ultrasound imaging in differently aggressive breast cancer xenografts using two novel ultrasound contrast agents (BR55 and BR38). Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(9):1988-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2138-y. View

5.
Nothacker M, Duda V, Hahn M, Warm M, Degenhardt F, Madjar H . Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2009; 9:335. PMC: 2760575. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-335. View