Delineating a Retesting Zone Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis on Serial QuantiFERON Tuberculosis Test Results in US Healthcare Workers
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective. To find a statistically significant separation point for the QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube (QFT) interferon gamma release assay that could define an optimal "retesting zone" for use in serially tested low-risk populations who have test "reversions" from initially positive to subsequently negative results. Method. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) to analyze retrospective data collected from 3 major hospitals, we searched for predictors of reversion until statistically significant separation points were revealed. A confirmatory regression analysis was performed on an additional sample. Results. In 575 initially positive US healthcare workers (HCWs), 300 (52.2%) had reversions, while 275 (47.8%) had two sequential positive tests. The most statistically significant (Kappa = 0.48, chi-square = 131.0, P < 0.001) separation point identified by the ROC for predicting reversion was the tuberculosis antigen minus-nil (TBag-nil) value at 1.11 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL). The second separation point was found at TBag-nil at 0.72 IU/mL (Kappa = 0.16, chi-square = 8.2, P < 0.01). The model was validated by the regression analysis of 287 HCWs. Conclusion. Reversion likelihood increases as the TBag-nil approaches the manufacturer's cut-point of 0.35 IU/mL. The most statistically significant separation point between those who test repeatedly positive and those who revert is 1.11 IU/mL. Clinicians should retest low-risk individuals with initial QFT results < 1.11 IU/mL.
Retrospective Performance Analyses of over Two Million U.S. QuantiFERON Blood Sample Results.
Bi C, Clark R, Master R, Kapoor H, Kroll M, Salm A Microbiol Spectr. 2021; 9(1):e0009621.
PMID: 34319139 PMC: 8552680. DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.00096-21.
Corvino A, Monaco M, Garzillo E, Grimaldi E, Donnarumma G, Miraglia N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(18).
PMID: 32957500 PMC: 7557828. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186773.
Park J, Kim N, Park H, Kim T, Park S, Roh E PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0235254.
PMID: 32603343 PMC: 7326217. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235254.
Walles J, Tesfaye F, Jansson M, Balcha T, Winqvist N, Kefeni M PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0193589.
PMID: 29617458 PMC: 5884484. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193589.
Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Mycobacteria.
Forbes B, Hall G, Miller M, Novak S, Rowlinson M, Salfinger M Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018; 31(2).
PMID: 29386234 PMC: 5967691. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00038-17.