» Articles » PMID: 23325775

Perception of Silent and Motionless Prey on Vegetation by Echolocation in the Gleaning Bat Micronycteris Microtis

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2013 Jan 18
PMID 23325775
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gleaning insectivorous bats that forage by using echolocation within dense forest vegetation face the sensorial challenge of acoustic masking effects. Active perception of silent and motionless prey in acoustically cluttered environments by echolocation alone has thus been regarded impossible. The gleaning insectivorous bat Micronycteris microtis however, forages in dense understory vegetation and preys on insects, including dragonflies, which rest silent and motionless on vegetation. From behavioural experiments, we show that M. microtis uses echolocation as the sole sensorial modality for successful prey perception within a complex acoustic environment. All individuals performed a stereotypical three-dimensional hovering flight in front of prey items, while continuously emitting short, multi-harmonic, broadband echolocation calls. We observed a high precision in target localization which suggests that M. microtis perceives a detailed acoustic image of the prey based on shape, surface structure and material. Our experiments provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence that a gleaning bat uses echolocation alone for successful detection, classification and precise localization of silent and motionless prey in acoustic clutter. Overall, we conclude that the three-dimensional hovering flight of M. microtis in combination with a frequent emission of short, high-frequency echolocation calls is the key for active prey perception in acoustically highly cluttered environments.

Citing Articles

SonoNERFs: Neural Radiance Fields Applied to Biological Echolocation Systems Allow 3D Scene Reconstruction through Perceptual Prediction.

Jansen W, Steckel J Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(6).

PMID: 38921202 PMC: 11201853. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9060321.


Multimodal duetting in katydids under bat predation risk: a winning strategy for both sexes.

Saha K, Joshi K, Balakrishnan R Biol Lett. 2023; 19(5):20230110.

PMID: 37194255 PMC: 10189300. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0110.


Ear pinnae in a neotropical katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) function as ultrasound guides for bat detection.

Pulver C, Celiker E, Woodrow C, Geipel I, Soulsbury C, Cullen D Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36170144 PMC: 9519150. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.77628.


Airport noise disturbs foraging behavior of Japanese pipistrelle bats.

Wang W, Gao H, Li C, Deng Y, Zhou D, Li Y Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(6):e8976.

PMID: 35784026 PMC: 9189338. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8976.


Functional differences in echolocation call design in an adaptive radiation of bats.

Leiser-Miller L, Santana S Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(22):16153-16164.

PMID: 34824818 PMC: 8601877. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8296.


References
1.
Tuttle M, Ryan M . Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics. Science. 1981; 214(4521):677-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.214.4521.677. View

2.
Siemers B, Schnitzler H . Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species. Nature. 2004; 429(6992):657-61. DOI: 10.1038/nature02547. View

3.
Boonman A, Jones G . Intensity control during target approach in echolocating bats; stereotypical sensori-motor behaviour in Daubenton's bats, Myotis daubentonii. J Exp Biol. 2002; 205(Pt 18):2865-74. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.18.2865. View

4.
Holderied M, Jones G, von Helversen O . Flight and echolocation behaviour of whiskered bats commuting along a hedgerow: range-dependent sonar signal design, Doppler tolerance and evidence for 'acoustic focussing'. J Exp Biol. 2006; 209(Pt 10):1816-26. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02194. View

5.
Schmidt S, Hanke S, Pillat J . The role of echolocation in the hunting of terrestrial prey--new evidence for an underestimated strategy in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra. J Comp Physiol A. 2001; 186(10):975-88. DOI: 10.1007/s003590000151. View