» Articles » PMID: 23325525

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prophylaxis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2013 Jan 18
PMID 23325525
Citations 213
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The multicenter PROTECT AF study (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) was conducted to determine whether percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with a filter device (Watchman) was noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Methods And Results: Patients (n=707) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 risk factor (age >75 years, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, or prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) were randomized to either the Watchman device (n=463) or continued warfarin (n=244) in a 2:1 ratio. After device implantation, warfarin was continued for ≈45 days, followed by clopidogrel for 4.5 months and lifelong aspirin. Study discontinuation rates were 15.3% (71/463) and 22.5% (55/244) for the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively. The time in therapeutic range for the warfarin group was 66%. The composite primary efficacy end point included stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death, and the primary analysis was by intention to treat. After 1588 patient-years of follow-up (mean 2.3±1.1 years), the primary efficacy event rates were 3.0% and 4.3% (percent per 100 patient-years) in the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.44%-1.30% per year), which met the criteria for noninferiority (probability of noninferiority >0.999). There were more primary safety events in the Watchman group (5.5% per year; 95% confidence interval, 4.2%-7.1% per year) than in the control group (3.6% per year; 95% confidence interval, 2.2%-5.3% per year; relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.70).

Conclusions: The "local" strategy of left atrial appendage closure is noninferior to "systemic" anticoagulation with warfarin. PROTECT AF has, for the first time, implicated the left atrial appendage in the pathogenesis of stroke in atrial fibrillation.

Clinical Trial Registration: : URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00129545.

Citing Articles

The Reconstructed Individual Patient Data from Kaplan-Meier (IPDfromKM) Method for Non-Inferiority Analyses: A New Potential Application.

Piragine E, Trippoli S, Veneziano S, Messori A, Calderone V Methods Protoc. 2025; 8(1).

PMID: 39997637 PMC: 11857869. DOI: 10.3390/mps8010013.


Intracardiac or transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial appendage occlusion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Beneki E, Dimitriadis K, Theofilis P, Pyrpyris N, Iliakis P, Kalompatsou A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025; 41(3):489-505.

PMID: 39843560 PMC: 11880089. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-025-03330-z.


Adverse events in clinically complex elderly patients with atrial fibrillation according to oral anticoagulation status.

Bucci T, Romiti G, Ishiguchi H, Gerra L, Mantovani M, Huang B EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 78:102974.

PMID: 39687426 PMC: 11648801. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102974.


Revisiting Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Oral Anticoagulants in Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation Management: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Requiao Radel Neto G, Bittar de Morais L, Hideki Sheguti R, Poci Liberato A Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e70854.

PMID: 39493042 PMC: 11531794. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70854.


Correlations Between Plasma BNP Level and Risk of Thrombotic-Hemorrhagic Events After Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Imamura T, Kataoka N, Tanaka S, Ueno H, Kinugawa K, Nakashima M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458182 PMC: 11508434. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206232.