» Articles » PMID: 23325259

Spatial and Object-based Attention Modulates Broadband High-frequency Responses Across the Human Visual Cortical Hierarchy

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Jan 18
PMID 23325259
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the puzzling aspects in the visual attention literature is the discrepancy between electrophysiological and fMRI findings: whereas fMRI studies reveal strong attentional modulation in the earliest visual areas, single-unit and local field potential studies yielded mixed results. In addition, it is not clear to what extent spatial attention effects extend from early to high-order visual areas. Here we addressed these issues using electrocorticography recordings in epileptic patients. The patients performed a task that allowed simultaneous manipulation of both spatial and object-based attention. They were presented with composite stimuli, consisting of a small object (face or house) superimposed on a large one, and in separate blocks, were instructed to attend one of the objects. We found a consistent increase in broadband high-frequency (30-90 Hz) power, but not in visual evoked potentials, associated with spatial attention starting with V1/V2 and continuing throughout the visual hierarchy. The magnitude of the attentional modulation was correlated with the spatial selectivity of each electrode and its distance from the occipital pole. Interestingly, the latency of the attentional modulation showed a significant decrease along the visual hierarchy. In addition, electrodes placed over high-order visual areas (e.g., fusiform gyrus) showed both effects of spatial and object-based attention. Overall, our results help to reconcile previous observations of discrepancy between fMRI and electrophysiology. They also imply that spatial attention effects can be found both in early and high-order visual cortical areas, in parallel with their stimulus tuning properties.

Citing Articles

The Synergy Zone: Connecting the Mind, Brain, and Heart for the Ideal Classroom Learning Environment.

Zadina J Brain Sci. 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37759915 PMC: 10526388. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091314.


Fronto-parietal networks shape human conscious report through attention gain and reorienting.

Liu J, Bayle D, Spagna A, Sitt J, Bourgeois A, Lehongre K Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):730.

PMID: 37454150 PMC: 10349830. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05108-2.


Low and high frequency intracranial neural signals match in the human associative cortex.

Jacques C, Jonas J, Colnat-Coulbois S, Maillard L, Rossion B Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36074548 PMC: 9457683. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.76544.


Local neuronal relational structures underlying the contents of human conscious experience.

Malach R Neurosci Conscious. 2021; 2021(2):niab028.

PMID: 34513028 PMC: 8415036. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niab028.


Brain-to-Brain Synchrony in the STEM Classroom.

Davidesco I CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020; 19(3):es8.

PMID: 32870083 PMC: 8711813. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.19-11-0258.


References
1.
OCraven K, Downing P, Kanwisher N . fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature. 1999; 401(6753):584-7. DOI: 10.1038/44134. View

2.
Avidan G, Levy I, Hendler T, Zohary E, Malach R . Spatial vs. object specific attention in high-order visual areas. Neuroimage. 2003; 19(2 Pt 1):308-18. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00092-2. View

3.
Reynolds J, Chelazzi L . Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004; 27:611-47. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131039. View

4.
Buffalo E, Fries P, Landman R, Liang H, Desimone R . A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 107(1):361-5. PMC: 2806732. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907658106. View

5.
Buffalo E, Fries P, Landman R, Buschman T, Desimone R . Laminar differences in gamma and alpha coherence in the ventral stream. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(27):11262-7. PMC: 3131344. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1011284108. View