» Articles » PMID: 23324041

Three-dimensional Pharyngeal Airway Changes in Orthodontic Patients Treated with and Without Extractions

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2013 Jan 18
PMID 23324041
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare three-dimensional pharyngeal airway changes in orthodontic patients treated with and without extractions.

Material And Methods: Pharyngeal airway was analyzed for 31 subjects (15 males, 16 females) treated with extractions of four first premolars and 31 age- and gender-matched controls (15 males, 16 females) treated without extractions. The mean age of subjects was 12.97 ± 1.15 years at the beginning and 15.69 ± 1.28 years at the end of treatment. The mean age of controls was 12.86 ± 0.74 years at the beginning and 15.18 ± 0.86 years at the end of treatment. Nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) volumes, area of maximum pharyngeal constriction (AMPC), and upper arch perimeter were measured on T0 and T1 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Paired samples t-test was used for analyzing statistical significance of changes (p ≤ 0.05).

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the pharyngeal airway values between the extraction and non-extraction groups at neither T0 nor T1. The extraction group showed a statistically significant increase for NP and OP volumes and AMPC values. Such increase was also noted in the non-extraction group, without statistical significance for AMPC values.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that an extraction or non-extraction choice for orthodontic treatment would not affect the pharyngeal airway.

Citing Articles

Extraction of premolars in orthodontic treatment does not negatively affect upper airway volume and minimum cross-sectional area: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Papageorgiou S, Zyli M, Papadopoulou A Eur J Orthod. 2025; 47(2).

PMID: 40062590 PMC: 11891658. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjaf012.


Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis of craniofacial phenotype in nonobese apneic young adults.

Jadoul M, Albert A, Maes N, Poirrier R, Poirrier A, Bruwier A Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025; 10(1):e70061.

PMID: 39897118 PMC: 11783401. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.70061.


[Comparison of pharyngeal airway space on lateral head radiographs of skeletal class I and II individuals].

Razo Huillca S Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2024; 10(4):e128.

PMID: 38390606 PMC: 10880722. DOI: 10.21142/2523-2754-1004-2022-128.


Changes in Upper Airway Anatomy Following Orthodontic Treatment for Malocclusion: A Comparative Retrospective Study in 96 Patients.

Yuzbasioglu Ertugrul B Med Sci Monit. 2023; 29:e941749.

PMID: 37946407 PMC: 10644701. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.941749.


Effect of premolar extraction and anchorage type for orthodontic space closure on upper airway dimensions and position of hyoid bone in adults: a retrospective cephalometric assessment.

Mortezai O, Shalli Z, Tofangchiha M, Alizadeh A, Pagnoni F, Reda R PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15960.

PMID: 37901473 PMC: 10601897. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15960.