» Articles » PMID: 23318687

Malignant Potential of Skull Base Versus Non-skull Base Meningiomas: Clinical Series of 1,663 Cases

Overview
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2013 Jan 16
PMID 23318687
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: About 90 % of meningiomas are benign (WHO grade I), atypical and anaplastic variants exist (WHO grade II/III, 10 %). Tumour grade has important implications for management. Non-invasive diagnosis of tumour grade is still not feasible. The purpose of this survey was to analyse epidemiological risk factors such as sex, age and location for a higher grade (WHO grade II/III) meningioma in a large surgical series.

Methods: A retrospective study comprising 1,663 patients operated on for an intracranial meningioma in a single tertiary-care centre. The population was analysed for correlations including WHO grade, histological subtype, tumour localisation, patient age and gender. Additionally correlations between Ki67 index/WHO grade and localisation were analysed.

Results: A binary logistic regression analysis revealed non-skull base localisation (OR 1.779 [CI 1.069-2.960, p = 0.0027]) and age ≥65 years (OR 1.549 [CI 1.214-2.624, p = 0.012]) as significant risk factors for a higher WHO grade. Male gender showed a trend for a higher risk in χ(2) analysis. An analysis of the Ki67 index revealed an increased index for non-skull base localisation compared with skull base (p < 0.001). Correlation analysis of Ki67 distribution in WHO grade I meningiomas revealed higher Ki67 indices for non skull base localisation (p = 0.0024).

Conclusions: Non-skull base localisation and age ≥65 years are independent risk factors for higher grade meningiomas. In other terms, the malignant potential of skull base meningiomas is low. This information is important when advising a patient about individual treatment options (observation, surgery or radio-surgery) and prognosis.

Citing Articles

Comparison of adjuvant radiation versus observation and salvage radiation after subtotal resection of a WHO grade I skull base meningioma: a propensity score-adjusted analysis.

Kosanam A, Ma J, White A, Murayi R, Soni P, Recinos P J Neurooncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39998721 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-04980-8.


Malignant Transformation of Meningiomas.

Yu J, Deng J, Ren L, Hua L, Gong Y J Cancer. 2025; 16(5):1684-1693.

PMID: 39991581 PMC: 11843249. DOI: 10.7150/jca.105024.


Risk factors associated with higher WHO grade in meningiomas: a multicentric study of 552 skull base meningiomas.

May M, Sedlak V, Pecen L, Priban V, Buchvald P, Fiedler J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3715.

PMID: 39880897 PMC: 11779799. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87882-z.


Fluorescence guidance in skull base surgery: Applications and limitations - A systematic review.

Suero Molina E, Bruneau M, Reuter G, Shahein M, Cavallo L, Daniel R Brain Spine. 2024; 4:103328.

PMID: 39309550 PMC: 11416557. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.103328.


Anaplastic Transformation of Sphenoid Wing Meningioma With Orbital and Cavernous Sinus Invasion: Unveiling the Aggressive Nature.

Penchev P, Kalnev B, Petrova S, Petrov P, Kalnev M Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e57025.

PMID: 38681274 PMC: 11046492. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57025.