» Articles » PMID: 23318238

Community-centred Eco-bio-social Approach to Control Dengue Vectors: an Intervention Study from Myanmar

Overview
Date 2013 Jan 16
PMID 23318238
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To build up and analyse the feasibility, process, and effectiveness of a partnership-driven ecosystem management intervention in reducing dengue vector breeding and constructing sustainable partnerships among multiple stakeholders.

Methods: A community-based intervention study was conducted from May 2009 to January 2010 in Yangon city. Six high-risk and six low-risk clusters were randomized and allocated as intervention and routine service areas, respectively. For each cluster, 100 households were covered. Bi-monthly entomological evaluations (i.e. larval and pupal surveys) and household acceptability surveys at the end of 6-month intervention period were conducted, supplemented by qualitative evaluations. Intervention description: The strategies included eco-friendly multi-stakeholder partner groups (Thingaha) and ward-based volunteers, informed decision-making of householders, followed by integrated vector management approach.

Findings: Pupae per person index (PPI) decreased at the last evaluation by 5·7% (0·35-0·33) in high-risk clusters. But in low-risk clusters, PPI remarkably decreased by 63·6% (0·33-0·12). In routine service area, PPI also decreased due to availability of Temephos after Cyclone Nargis. As for total number of pupae in all containers, when compared to evaluation 1, there was a reduction of 18·6% in evaluation 2 and 44·1% in evaluation 3 in intervention area. However, in routine service area, more reduction was observed. All intervention tools were found as acceptable, being feasible to implement by multi-stakeholder partner groups.

Conclusions: The efficacy of community-controlled partnership-driven interventions was found to be superior to the vertical approach in terms of sustainability and community empowerment.

Citing Articles

Facilitators and barriers to engaging communities in health service research on dengue control in Indo-Pacific region: a systematic review.

Naing C, Htet N, Tung W, Aung H, Whittaker M BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1924.

PMID: 37798703 PMC: 10552252. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16845-8.


Efficacy of household larval control practices in a peri-urban township, Yangon, Myanmar: Implication for entomological surveillance.

Aung S, Kyaw A, Jittamala P, Lawpoolsri S, Soonthornworasiri N, Sriwichai P Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e18083.

PMID: 37483793 PMC: 10362226. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18083.


Effectiveness of Positive Deviance, an Asset-Based Behavior Change Approach, to Improve Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Dengue in Low-Income Communities (Slums) of Islamabad, Pakistan: A Mixed-Method Study.

Shafique M, Mukhtar M, Areesantichai C, Perngparn U Insects. 2022; 13(1).

PMID: 35055914 PMC: 8780378. DOI: 10.3390/insects13010071.


Implementation of guppy fish (Poecilia reticulata), and a novel larvicide (Pyriproxyfen) product (Sumilarv 2MR) for dengue control in Cambodia: A qualitative study of acceptability, sustainability and community engagement.

Shafique M, Lopes S, Doum D, Keo V, Sokha L, Sam B PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019; 13(11):e0007907.

PMID: 31738759 PMC: 6886868. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007907.


Environmental methods for dengue vector control - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Buhler C, Winkler V, Runge-Ranzinger S, Boyce R, Horstick O PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019; 13(7):e0007420.

PMID: 31295250 PMC: 6650086. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007420.


References
1.
Horstick O, Runge-Ranzinger S, Nathan M, Kroeger A . Dengue vector-control services: how do they work? A systematic literature review and country case studies. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010; 104(6):379-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.07.027. View

2.
Tun-Lin W, Kay B, Barnes A . Understanding productivity, a key to Aedes aegypti surveillance. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995; 53(6):595-601. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.595. View

3.
Tun-Lin W, Lenhart A, Nam V, Rebollar-Tellez E, Morrison A, Barbazan P . Reducing costs and operational constraints of dengue vector control by targeting productive breeding places: a multi-country non-inferiority cluster randomized trial. Trop Med Int Health. 2009; 14(9):1143-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02341.x. View

4.
Arunachalam N, Tana S, Espino F, Kittayapong P, Abeyewickreme W, Wai K . Eco-bio-social determinants of dengue vector breeding: a multicountry study in urban and periurban Asia. Bull World Health Organ. 2010; 88(3):173-84. PMC: 2828788. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.09.067892. View

5.
Heintze C, Velasco Garrido M, Kroeger A . What do community-based dengue control programmes achieve? A systematic review of published evaluations. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006; 101(4):317-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.08.007. View