Community-centred Eco-bio-social Approach to Control Dengue Vectors: an Intervention Study from Myanmar
Overview
Microbiology
Public Health
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: To build up and analyse the feasibility, process, and effectiveness of a partnership-driven ecosystem management intervention in reducing dengue vector breeding and constructing sustainable partnerships among multiple stakeholders.
Methods: A community-based intervention study was conducted from May 2009 to January 2010 in Yangon city. Six high-risk and six low-risk clusters were randomized and allocated as intervention and routine service areas, respectively. For each cluster, 100 households were covered. Bi-monthly entomological evaluations (i.e. larval and pupal surveys) and household acceptability surveys at the end of 6-month intervention period were conducted, supplemented by qualitative evaluations. Intervention description: The strategies included eco-friendly multi-stakeholder partner groups (Thingaha) and ward-based volunteers, informed decision-making of householders, followed by integrated vector management approach.
Findings: Pupae per person index (PPI) decreased at the last evaluation by 5·7% (0·35-0·33) in high-risk clusters. But in low-risk clusters, PPI remarkably decreased by 63·6% (0·33-0·12). In routine service area, PPI also decreased due to availability of Temephos after Cyclone Nargis. As for total number of pupae in all containers, when compared to evaluation 1, there was a reduction of 18·6% in evaluation 2 and 44·1% in evaluation 3 in intervention area. However, in routine service area, more reduction was observed. All intervention tools were found as acceptable, being feasible to implement by multi-stakeholder partner groups.
Conclusions: The efficacy of community-controlled partnership-driven interventions was found to be superior to the vertical approach in terms of sustainability and community empowerment.
Naing C, Htet N, Tung W, Aung H, Whittaker M BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1924.
PMID: 37798703 PMC: 10552252. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16845-8.
Aung S, Kyaw A, Jittamala P, Lawpoolsri S, Soonthornworasiri N, Sriwichai P Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e18083.
PMID: 37483793 PMC: 10362226. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18083.
Shafique M, Mukhtar M, Areesantichai C, Perngparn U Insects. 2022; 13(1).
PMID: 35055914 PMC: 8780378. DOI: 10.3390/insects13010071.
Shafique M, Lopes S, Doum D, Keo V, Sokha L, Sam B PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019; 13(11):e0007907.
PMID: 31738759 PMC: 6886868. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007907.
Environmental methods for dengue vector control - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Buhler C, Winkler V, Runge-Ranzinger S, Boyce R, Horstick O PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019; 13(7):e0007420.
PMID: 31295250 PMC: 6650086. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007420.