» Articles » PMID: 23316149

Automated Classification of Mouse Pup Isolation Syllables: from Cluster Analysis to an Excel-based "mouse Pup Syllable Classification Calculator"

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2013 Jan 15
PMID 23316149
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mouse pups vocalize at high rates when they are cold or isolated from the nest. The proportions of each syllable type produced carry information about disease state and are being used as behavioral markers for the internal state of animals. Manual classifications of these vocalizations identified 10 syllable types based on their spectro-temporal features. However, manual classification of mouse syllables is time consuming and vulnerable to experimenter bias. This study uses an automated cluster analysis to identify acoustically distinct syllable types produced by CBA/CaJ mouse pups, and then compares the results to prior manual classification methods. The cluster analysis identified two syllable types, based on their frequency bands, that have continuous frequency-time structure, and two syllable types featuring abrupt frequency transitions. Although cluster analysis computed fewer syllable types than manual classification, the clusters represented well the probability distributions of the acoustic features within syllables. These probability distributions indicate that some of the manually classified syllable types are not statistically distinct. The characteristics of the four classified clusters were used to generate a Microsoft Excel-based mouse syllable classifier that rapidly categorizes syllables, with over a 90% match, into the syllable types determined by cluster analysis.

Citing Articles

Acoustic complexity of pup isolation calls in Mongolian hamsters: 3-frequency phenomena and chaos.

Rutovskaya M, Volodin I, Feoktistova N, Surov A, Gureeva A, Volodina E Curr Zool. 2024; 70(5):559-574.

PMID: 39463689 PMC: 11502153. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoad036.


Ultrasonic vocalization of pup and adult fat-tailed gerbils (Pachyuromys duprasi).

Zaytseva A, Volodin I, Ilchenko O, Volodina E PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219749.

PMID: 31356642 PMC: 6663002. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219749.


Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization (USV) Songs.

Chabout J, Jones-Macopson J, Jarvis E J Vis Exp. 2017; (123).

PMID: 28518074 PMC: 5607930. DOI: 10.3791/54137.


MUPET-Mouse Ultrasonic Profile ExTraction: A Signal Processing Tool for Rapid and Unsupervised Analysis of Ultrasonic Vocalizations.

Van Segbroeck M, Knoll A, Levitt P, Narayanan S Neuron. 2017; 94(3):465-485.e5.

PMID: 28472651 PMC: 5939957. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.005.


Discrimination of frequency modulated sweeps by mice.

Screven L, Dent M J Acoust Soc Am. 2016; 140(3):1481.

PMID: 27914389 PMC: 6910002. DOI: 10.1121/1.4962223.


References
1.
McAllister B, Kiryanova V, Dyck R . Behavioural outcomes of perinatal maternal fluoxetine treatment. Neuroscience. 2012; 226:356-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.09.024. View

2.
DAmato F, Scalera E, Sarli C, Moles A . Pups call, mothers rush: does maternal responsiveness affect the amount of ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse pups?. Behav Genet. 2005; 35(1):103-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10519-004-0860-9. View

3.
Holy T, Guo Z . Ultrasonic songs of male mice. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3(12):e386. PMC: 1275525. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030386. View

4.
Portfors C . Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2007; 46(1):28-34. View

5.
Hahn M, Schanz N . The effects of cold, rotation, and genotype on the production of ultrasonic calls in infant mice. Behav Genet. 2002; 32(4):267-73. DOI: 10.1023/a:1019728813891. View