» Articles » PMID: 23311659

Orthodontic Miniscrew Failure Rate and Root Proximity, Insertion Angle, Bone Contact Length, and Bone Density

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2013 Jan 15
PMID 23311659
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To test the hypothesis that there is no significant correlation between miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density.

Setting And Sample Population: This study included 107 patients in whom 190 miniscrews had been placed from April 2008 to October 2009 in Tohoku University Hospital (Sendai, Japan).

Materials And Methods: Cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT) and periapical radiographs were taken before and after miniscrew placement. Differences in root proximity, screw insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density were statistically compared; comparisons were also made between the CBCT images and periapical radiographs.

Results: A significantly higher success rate was observed in the maxilla than in the mandible. The distance between the miniscrew and the root surface was significantly smaller in the failure group. There were no significant differences in the insertion angle, bone contact length, or bone density between the success group and the failure group. The concordance rate between the periapical dental radiographs and CBCT images was 46.5%.

Conclusion: While bone contact length, miniscrew angle, and bone density did not exert major effects on miniscrew failure, root proximity was the factor that most affected miniscrew failure, especially for miniscrews placed in the mandible. CBCT was superior to periapical dental X-rays for evaluating the proximity of miniscrews to the root. Correction of the X-ray attenuation coefficient value was necessary for measuring bone density using CBCT.

Citing Articles

Tooth movement with dental anchorage vs. skeletal anchorage: A systematic review of clinical trials.

Ravelo V, Olate G, Brito L, Sacco R, Olate S J Orthod Sci. 2024; 13:25.

PMID: 38784081 PMC: 11114462. DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_4_23.


Comparing the Efficiency of Infrazygomatic Crest (IZC) Screws and Conventional Method for Anterior Retraction in Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment for Class 2 Malocclusion: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Shetty S, Ramesh A, Maniyankod S, Parveen K, Selvakumar S, Mubeen M Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54599.

PMID: 38524017 PMC: 10959471. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54599.


Application of metal artifact reduction algorithm for CBCT diagnosis of temporary anchorage device-tooth root contact: inadequate to reduce false-positive rate.

McLaughlin V, Liu J, Kalim S, Nguyen K, Kim D, Sun Z Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023; 52(6):20220396.

PMID: 37427694 PMC: 10461258. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20220396.


Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a bibliometric analysis of the 50 most-cited articles from 2012 to 2022.

Ferrillo M, Nucci L, Gallo V, Bruni A, Montrella R, Fortunato L Angle Orthod. 2023; 93(5):591-602.

PMID: 37200455 PMC: 10575636. DOI: 10.2319/010923-18.1.


Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of a novel miniscrew made of ZrNiCuAl bulk metallic glass for orthodontic anchorage.

Sasaki S, Seiryu M, Ida H, Miyashita S, Takeshita N, Irie D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3038.

PMID: 36810765 PMC: 9943840. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30102-3.