» Articles » PMID: 23307177

The Prevalence of Approximal Caries in Patients After Fixed Orthodontic Treatment and in Untreated Subjects: a Retrospective, Cross-sectional Study on Bitewing Radiographs

Overview
Journal J Orofac Orthop
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2013 Jan 12
PMID 23307177
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this retrospective, cross-sectional study was to investigate the prevalence of approximal carious lesions in patients after fixed multibracket therapy and in subjects without orthodontics on bitewing radiographs.

Material And Methods: Bitewing radiographs of 104 orthodontically treated patients with fixed multibracket appliances were compared to those of 111 untreated subjects. The individuals in both groups were between 15 and 16.25 years of age when radiographs were taken. The test group with orthodontics was recruited from the archive of the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Zürich. The untreated control group was selected randomly from 16 communities in the Canton of Zürich. The approximal surfaces of the permanent premolars and molars of all subjects were assessed by two calibrated investigators.

Results: The average number of enamel lesions in the test group after fixed orthodontic treatment was lower than in the control group (0.57 vs. 1.85, p < 0.001). The same was found for dentin lesions (0.06 vs. 0.49, p < 0.001). The distribution of lesions was similar in both groups.

Conclusion: Fewer approximal carious lesions were detected in the test group after fixed multibracket appliances than in the age-matched control group without orthodontic treatment.

Citing Articles

Caries and white spot lesion trajectories of orthodontic patients across an observation period of 20 years.

Ganss C, Schulz-Weidner N, Klaus K, von Bremen J, Ruf S, Bock N Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(7):367.

PMID: 38861170 PMC: 11166817. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05752-w.


The Impact of Orthodontic Bands on the Marginal Periodontium of Maxillary First Molars: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Radiographic Analysis.

Teubner S, Schmidlin P, Menghini G, Attin T, Baumgartner S Open Dent J. 2018; 12:312-321.

PMID: 29760824 PMC: 5944122. DOI: 10.2174/1874210601812010312.


Caries outcomes after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: a longitudinal prospective study.

Chen W, Zhou Y Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(2):2815-22.

PMID: 25932240 PMC: 4402887.

References
1.
Boersma J, van der Veen M, Lagerweij M, Bokhout B, Prahl-Andersen B . Caries prevalence measured with QLF after treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances: influencing factors. Caries Res. 2004; 39(1):41-7. DOI: 10.1159/000081655. View

2.
Pontual A, de Melo D, De Almeida S, Boscolo F, Haiter Neto F . Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39(7):431-6. PMC: 3520190. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/94985823. View

3.
Stephen K, RUSSELL J, Creanor S, Burchell C . Comparison of fibre optic transillumination with clinical and radiographic caries diagnosis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987; 15(2):90-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1987.tb00489.x. View

4.
Atack N, Sandy J, Addy M . Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review. J Periodontol. 1996; 67(2):78-85. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1996.67.2.78. View

5.
Mitchell L . Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances--an overview. Br J Orthod. 1992; 19(3):199-205. DOI: 10.1179/bjo.19.3.199. View