» Articles » PMID: 23306819

The International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (ICUROS)--quality of Life During the First 4 Months After Fracture

Abstract

Unlabelled: The quality of life during the first 4 months after fracture was estimated in 2,808 fractured patients from 11 countries. Analysis showed that there were significant differences in the quality of life (QoL) loss between countries. Other factors such as QoL prior fracture and hospitalisation also had a significant impact on the QoL loss.

Introduction: The International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (ICUROS) was initiated in 2007 with the objective of estimating costs and quality of life related to fractures in several countries worldwide. The ICUROS is ongoing and enrols patients in 11 countries (Australia, Austria, Estonia, France, Italy, Lithuania, Mexico, Russia, Spain, UK and the USA). The objective of this paper is to outline the study design of ICUROS and present results regarding the QoL (measured using the EQ-5D) during the first 4 months after fracture based on the patients that have been thus far enrolled ICUROS.

Methods: ICUROS uses a prospective study design where data (costs and quality of life) are collected in four phases over 18 months after fracture. All countries use the same core case report forms. Quality of life was collected using the EQ-5D instrument and a time trade-off questionnaire.

Results: The total sample for the analysis was 2,808 patients (1,273 hip, 987 distal forearm and 548 vertebral fracture). For all fracture types and countries, the QoL was reduced significantly after fracture compared to pre-fracture QoL. A regression analysis showed that there were significant differences in the QoL loss between countries. Also, a higher level of QoL prior to the fracture significantly increased the QoL loss and patients who were hospitalised for their fracture also had a significantly higher loss compared to those who were not.

Conclusions: The findings in this study indicate that there appear to be important variations in the QoL decrements related to fracture between countries.

Citing Articles

Health-Related Quality of Life in Men with Fractures and Fear of Falling in General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Zwart M, Azagra-Ledesma R, Diaz-Herrera M, Pujol J, Saez M, Aguye-Batista A J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941596 PMC: 11818713. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030925.


Fracture-Related Safety Reporting of JAK Inhibitors: An Analysis from the WHO Global VigiBase.

Martinez de la Torre A, Clausen A, Burden A, Weiler S Drug Saf. 2024; 48(2):191-201.

PMID: 39604587 PMC: 11785614. DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01490-w.


Cost-effectiveness intervention thresholds for romosozumab and teriparatide in the treatment of osteoporosis in the UK.

Borgstrom F, Lorentzon M, Johansson H, Harvey N, McCloskey E, Willems D Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(12):2183-2193.

PMID: 39365433 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07251-w.


Teriparatide in postmenopausal osteoporosis: uncovering novel insights into efficacy and safety compared to other treatments - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vithran D, Essien A, Rahmati M, Opoku M, Yon D, Lopez Sanchez G EFORT Open Rev. 2024; 9(9):845-861.

PMID: 39222329 PMC: 11457814. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0205.


Identifying and prioritizing recommendations to optimize transitions across the care journey for hip fractures: Results from a mixed-methods concept mapping study.

Guilcher S, Cadel L, Everall A, Bronskill S, Wodchis W, Thavorn K PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0307769.

PMID: 39186524 PMC: 11346730. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307769.


References
1.
Melton 3rd L, Chrischilles E, Cooper C, Lane A, Riggs B . Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis?. J Bone Miner Res. 1992; 7(9):1005-10. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070902. View

2.
Formiga F, Lopez-Soto A, Duaso E, Ruiz D, Chivite D, Perez-Castejon J . Differences in the characteristics of elderly patients suffering from hip fracture due to falls according to place of residence. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007; 8(8):533-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.06.007. View

3.
Kanis J, Johnell O, Oden A, Sembo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Dawson A . Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmö. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(8):669-74. DOI: 10.1007/s001980070064. View

4.
Hiligsmann M, Ethgen O, Richy F, Reginster J . Utility values associated with osteoporotic fracture: a systematic review of the literature. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008; 82(4):288-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-008-9117-6. View

5.
Tidermark J, Zethraeus N, Svensson O, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S . Quality of life related to fracture displacement among elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2002; 16(1):34-8. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200201000-00008. View