» Articles » PMID: 23301529

Discrete Choice Experiments in Pharmacy: a Review of the Literature

Overview
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 2013 Jan 11
PMID 23301529
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) have been widely used to elicit patient preferences for various healthcare services and interventions. The aim of our study was to conduct an in-depth scoping review of the literature and provide a current overview of the progressive application of DCEs within the field of pharmacy.

Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, ECONLIT) were searched (January 1990-August 2011) to identify published English language studies using DCEs within the pharmacy context. Data were abstracted with respect to DCE methodology and application to pharmacy.

Key Findings: Our search identified 12 studies. The DCE methodology was utilised to elicit preferences for different aspects of pharmacy products, therapy or services. Preferences were elicited from either patients or pharmacists, with just two studies incorporating the views of both. Most reviewed studies examined preferences for process-related or provider-related aspects with a lesser focus on health outcomes. Monetary attributes were considered to be important by most patients and pharmacists in the studies reviewed. Logit, probit or multinomial logit models were most commonly employed for estimation.

Conclusion: Our study showed that the pharmacy profession has adopted the DCE methodology consistent with the general health DCEs although the number of studies is quite limited. Future studies need to examine preferences of both patients and providers for particular products or disease-state management services. Incorporation of health outcome attributes in the design, testing for external validity and the incorporation of DCE results in economic evaluation framework to inform pharmacy policy remain important areas for future research.

Citing Articles

Quantifying Stated Preferences for Meningococcal Vaccines Among Adolescents/Young Adults and Parents of Adolescents in the United States: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Begum S, Cabrera E, Restrepo O, Burman C, Sohn W, Kuylen E Infect Dis Ther. 2024; 13(9):2001-2015.

PMID: 39044053 PMC: 11343927. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-01017-x.


Will the Public Engage with New Pharmacy Roles? Assessing Future Uptake of a Community Pharmacy Health Check Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Chua G, Bond C, Porteous T, Ryan M Patient. 2022; 15(4):473-483.

PMID: 35067857 PMC: 8784214. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00566-4.


A Robust Method for Sample Preparation of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour for LC/MS Untargeted Metabolomics.

Macioszek S, Dudzik D, Jacyna J, Wozniak A, Schoffski P, J Markuszewski M Metabolites. 2021; 11(8).

PMID: 34436495 PMC: 8400919. DOI: 10.3390/metabo11080554.


Identifying New Zealand Public Preferences for Pharmacist Prescribers in Primary Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Raghunandan R, Howard K, Marra C, Tordoff J, Smith A Patient. 2021; 15(1):77-92.

PMID: 34109570 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00529-9.


Identifying Community Pharmacist Preferences For Prescribing Services in Primary Care in New Zealand: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Raghunandan R, Howard K, Marra C, Tordoff J, Smith A Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020; 19(2):253-266.

PMID: 33073328 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00615-3.