» Articles » PMID: 23300441

A Strong Immune Response in Young Adult Honeybees Masks Their Increased Susceptibility to Infection Compared to Older Bees

Overview
Journal PLoS Pathog
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2013 Jan 10
PMID 23300441
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Honeybees, Apis mellifera, show age-related division of labor in which young adults perform maintenance ("housekeeping") tasks inside the colony before switching to outside foraging at approximately 23 days old. Disease resistance is an important feature of honeybee biology, but little is known about the interaction of pathogens and age-related division of labor. We tested a hypothesis that older forager bees and younger "house" bees differ in susceptibility to infection. We coupled an infection bioassay with a functional analysis of gene expression in individual bees using a whole genome microarray. Forager bees treated with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae s.l. survived for significantly longer than house bees. This was concomitant with substantial differences in gene expression including genes associated with immune function. In house bees, infection was associated with differential expression of 35 candidate immune genes contrasted with differential expression of only two candidate immune genes in forager bees. For control bees (i.e. not treated with M. anisopliae) the development from the house to the forager stage was associated with differential expression of 49 candidate immune genes, including up-regulation of the antimicrobial peptide gene abaecin, plus major components of the Toll pathway, serine proteases, and serpins. We infer that reduced pathogen susceptibility in forager bees was associated with age-related activation of specific immune system pathways. Our findings contrast with the view that the immunocompetence in social insects declines with the onset of foraging as a result of a trade-off in the allocation of resources for foraging. The up-regulation of immune-related genes in young adult bees in response to M. anisopliae infection was an indicator of disease susceptibility; this also challenges previous research in social insects, in which an elevated immune status has been used as a marker of increased disease resistance and fitness without considering the effects of age-related development.

Citing Articles

Behavioural individuality determines infection risk in clonal ant colonies.

Li Z, Bhat B, Frank E, Oliveira-Honorato T, Azuma F, Bachmann V Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):5233.

PMID: 37634010 PMC: 10460416. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40983-7.


Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Impact of the Biopesticide on the Immune System of Major Workers in .

Wu H, Xu Y, Zafar J, De Mandal S, Lin L, Lu Y Insects. 2023; 14(8).

PMID: 37623411 PMC: 10455567. DOI: 10.3390/insects14080701.


Viral Co-Infections and Antiviral Immunity in Honey Bees.

Durand T, Bonjour-Dalmon A, Dubois E Viruses. 2023; 15(5).

PMID: 37243302 PMC: 10220773. DOI: 10.3390/v15051217.


Sacbrood Virus: A Growing Threat to Honeybees and Wild Pollinators.

Wei R, Cao L, Feng Y, Chen Y, Chen G, Zheng H Viruses. 2022; 14(9).

PMID: 36146677 PMC: 9505205. DOI: 10.3390/v14091871.


Middle-Aged Worker Bees Express Higher Innate Immunity than Young Worker Bees in the Abdomen without the Digestive Tract of Worker Bees Reared in an Incubator.

Lin Y, Chen C, Hsu C Insects. 2022; 13(2).

PMID: 35206781 PMC: 8875513. DOI: 10.3390/insects13020209.


References
1.
Reber A, Chapuisat M . No evidence for immune priming in ants exposed to a fungal pathogen. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e35372. PMC: 3327680. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035372. View

2.
Bos N, Lefevre T, Jensen A, Dettorre P . Sick ants become unsociable. J Evol Biol. 2011; 25(2):342-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02425.x. View

3.
Wilson-Rich N, Dres S, Starks P . The ontogeny of immunity: development of innate immune strength in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). J Insect Physiol. 2008; 54(10-11):1392-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.07.016. View

4.
Tanji T, Ip Y . Regulators of the Toll and Imd pathways in the Drosophila innate immune response. Trends Immunol. 2005; 26(4):193-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2005.02.006. View

5.
Boomsma J . Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(16):R673-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.033. View