» Articles » PMID: 23300040

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT to Assess Metabolic Response in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Stable Disease After Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Jan 10
PMID 23300040
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare tumour enhancement patterns measured using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-CT with tumour metabolism measured using positron emission tomography (PET)-CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and stable disease after chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Methods: After treatment, 75 NSCLC tumours in 65 patients who had stable disease on DCE-CT according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumour (RECIST) were evaluated using PET-CT. On DCE-CT, relative enhancement ratios (RER) of tumour at 30, 60, 90, 120 s and 5 min after injection of contrast material were measured. Metabolic responses of tumours were classified into two groups according to the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) by PET-CT: complete metabolic response (CR) with an SUVmax of less than 2.5, and noncomplete metabolic response (NR) with an SUVmax of at least 2.5.

Results: Using the optimal RER₆₀ cutoff value of 43.7 % to predict NR of tumour gave 95.7 % sensitivity, 64.2 % specificity, and 82.1 % positive and 95.0 % negative predictive values. After adjusting for tumour size, the odds ratio for NR in tumour with an RER60 of at least 43.7 % was 70.85 (95 % CI = 7.95-630.91; P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Even when disease was stable according to RECIST, DCE-CT predicted hypermetabolic status of residual tumour in patients with NSCLC after treatment.

Key Points: • Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) can provide useful metabolic information about non-small cell lung cancer. • NSCLC lesions, even grossly stable after treatment, show various metabolic states. • DCE-CT enhancement patterns correlate with tumour metabolic status as shown by PET. • DCE-CT helps to assess hypermetabolic NSCLC as stable disease after treatment.

Citing Articles

Improving radiation physics, tumor visualisation, and treatment quantification in radiotherapy with spectral or dual-energy CT.

Kruis M J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 23(1):e13468.

PMID: 34743405 PMC: 8803285. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13468.


Imaging for Response Assessment in Radiation Oncology: Current and Emerging Techniques.

Stieb S, Kiser K, van Dijk L, Livingstone N, Elhalawani H, Elgohari B Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2019; 34(1):293-306.

PMID: 31739950 PMC: 7253297. DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.09.010.


Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Area-detector CT vs Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Perfusion MRI vs FDG-PET/CT: Comparison of Utility for Quantitative Therapeutic Outcome Prediction for NSCLC Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy.

Seki S, Fujisawa Y, Yui M, Kishida Y, Koyama H, Ohyu S Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019; 19(1):29-39.

PMID: 30880291 PMC: 7067914. DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0158.


CT perfusion imaging of lung cancer: benefit of motion correction for blood flow estimates.

Chu L, Knebel R, Shay A, Santos J, Badawi R, Gandara D Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(12):5069-5075.

PMID: 29869174 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5492-1.


CT imaging features associated with recurrence in non-small cell lung cancer patients after stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Li Q, Kim J, Balagurunathan Y, Qi J, Liu Y, Latifi K Radiat Oncol. 2017; 12(1):158.

PMID: 28946909 PMC: 5613447. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0892-y.


References
1.
Bellomi M, Petralia G, Sonzogni A, Giulia Zampino M, Rocca A . CT perfusion for the monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in rectal carcinoma: initial experience. Radiology. 2007; 244(2):486-93. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2442061189. View

2.
Tran L, Brown M, Goldin J, Yan X, Pais R, McNitt-Gray M . Comparison of treatment response classifications between unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements of metastatic lung lesions on chest computed tomography. Acad Radiol. 2004; 11(12):1355-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.09.004. View

3.
Suzuki C, Jacobsson H, Hatschek T, Torkzad M, Boden K, Eriksson-Alm Y . Radiologic measurements of tumor response to treatment: practical approaches and limitations. Radiographics. 2008; 28(2):329-44. DOI: 10.1148/rg.282075068. View

4.
Dean P, Niemi P, Kivisaari L, Kormano M . Comparative pharmacokinetics of gadolinium DTPA and gadolinium chloride. Invest Radiol. 1988; 23 Suppl 1:S258-60. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198809001-00055. View

5.
Pezzella F, Pastorino U, Tagliabue E, Andreola S, Sozzi G, Gasparini G . Non-small-cell lung carcinoma tumor growth without morphological evidence of neo-angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 1997; 151(5):1417-23. PMC: 1858069. View