Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT to Assess Metabolic Response in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Stable Disease After Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy
Overview
Affiliations
Objectives: To compare tumour enhancement patterns measured using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-CT with tumour metabolism measured using positron emission tomography (PET)-CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and stable disease after chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.
Methods: After treatment, 75 NSCLC tumours in 65 patients who had stable disease on DCE-CT according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumour (RECIST) were evaluated using PET-CT. On DCE-CT, relative enhancement ratios (RER) of tumour at 30, 60, 90, 120 s and 5 min after injection of contrast material were measured. Metabolic responses of tumours were classified into two groups according to the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) by PET-CT: complete metabolic response (CR) with an SUVmax of less than 2.5, and noncomplete metabolic response (NR) with an SUVmax of at least 2.5.
Results: Using the optimal RER₆₀ cutoff value of 43.7 % to predict NR of tumour gave 95.7 % sensitivity, 64.2 % specificity, and 82.1 % positive and 95.0 % negative predictive values. After adjusting for tumour size, the odds ratio for NR in tumour with an RER60 of at least 43.7 % was 70.85 (95 % CI = 7.95-630.91; P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Even when disease was stable according to RECIST, DCE-CT predicted hypermetabolic status of residual tumour in patients with NSCLC after treatment.
Key Points: • Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) can provide useful metabolic information about non-small cell lung cancer. • NSCLC lesions, even grossly stable after treatment, show various metabolic states. • DCE-CT enhancement patterns correlate with tumour metabolic status as shown by PET. • DCE-CT helps to assess hypermetabolic NSCLC as stable disease after treatment.
Kruis M J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 23(1):e13468.
PMID: 34743405 PMC: 8803285. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13468.
Imaging for Response Assessment in Radiation Oncology: Current and Emerging Techniques.
Stieb S, Kiser K, van Dijk L, Livingstone N, Elhalawani H, Elgohari B Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2019; 34(1):293-306.
PMID: 31739950 PMC: 7253297. DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.09.010.
Seki S, Fujisawa Y, Yui M, Kishida Y, Koyama H, Ohyu S Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019; 19(1):29-39.
PMID: 30880291 PMC: 7067914. DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0158.
CT perfusion imaging of lung cancer: benefit of motion correction for blood flow estimates.
Chu L, Knebel R, Shay A, Santos J, Badawi R, Gandara D Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(12):5069-5075.
PMID: 29869174 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5492-1.
Li Q, Kim J, Balagurunathan Y, Qi J, Liu Y, Latifi K Radiat Oncol. 2017; 12(1):158.
PMID: 28946909 PMC: 5613447. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0892-y.