» Articles » PMID: 23296402

Aneuploidy and Elevated CEA Indicate an Increased Risk for Metachronous Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Date 2013 Jan 9
PMID 23296402
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Presently, no markers exist to predict metachronous metastasis at the time a primary colorectal cancer is diagnosed. While aneuploidy indicates poor survival prognosis and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels the presence of recurrent disease, the predictive value of both markers regarding imminent metachronous metastases is unclear.

Methods: Sixty patients with distant recurrence throughout a 5-year follow-up (TM+) were randomly chosen and 60 patients without metastasis matched to this cohort (TM-). In addition, an enlarged collective (n = 217; n TM+ = 85, n TM- = 132) with median follow-up of 79.2 months was assessed by logistic regression regarding metachronous metastases. Univariate and stepwise regression analyses included clinicopathological characteristics, preoperative CEA levels and aneuploidy assessed by DNA image cytometry.

Results: The matched-pair collective showed aneuploidy in 71.1 % (TM-) and 85.0 % (TM+; p = 0.076), and elevated CEA in 24.5 % (TM-) and 52.2 % [TM+; odds ratio (OR), 3.414; p = 0.007]. The enlarged collective presented aneuploidy in 71.2 % (TM-) and 83.5 % (TM+; OR 2.050, p = 0.038), and elevated CEA in 28.6 % (TM-) and 48.9 % (TM+; OR 2.391, p = 0.020). Elevated CEA and aneuploidy did not show any association (p = 0.919). In contrast, logistic regression analyses demonstrated that besides increased T category (OR 1.745, p = 0.019), both elevated CEA level (OR 2.633, p = 0.015) and aneuploidy (OR 1.929, p = 0.058) were independent predictive markers for metachronous metastasis.

Conclusions: Our data show that aneuploidy and elevated CEA levels besides increased T category could serve for individual risk assessment to predict metachronous metastases. The fact that still aneuploidy missed the significance level by a small margin emphasizes the need for larger validation studies.

Citing Articles

A novel nomogram on predicting extrahepatic metastasis in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis for selective application of F-FDG PET/CT.

Zhu R, Zhao Y, Zhao J, Wang L, Wei S, Zhang B Int J Med Sci. 2025; 22(3):565-574.

PMID: 39898242 PMC: 11783081. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.104453.


Could Flow Cytometry Provide New Prognostic Markers in Colorectal Cancer?.

Georvasili V, Markopoulos G, Lampri E, Lianos G, Vartholomatos G, Mitsis M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200895 PMC: 11355755. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164753.


Establishing a carcinoembryonic antigen-associated competitive endogenous RNA network and forecasting an important regulatory axis in colon adenocarcinoma patients.

Liang F, Xu Y, Zheng H, Tang W J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 15(1):220-236.

PMID: 38482222 PMC: 10932660. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-24-43.


Which patients are prone to suffer liver metastasis? A review of risk factors of metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.

Hao M, Wang K, Ding Y, Li H, Liu Y, Ding L Eur J Med Res. 2022; 27(1):130.

PMID: 35879739 PMC: 9310475. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00759-z.


The decreased platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio could predict a good prognosis in patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer: a single-center cohort retrospective study.

Huang X, Cui J, Li X, Liu C, Sun J, Yue J World J Surg Oncol. 2021; 19(1):297.

PMID: 34645481 PMC: 8513170. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02406-z.


References
1.
Sun X . Clinicopathological and biological features of DNA tetraploid colorectal cancers. Cancer J. 2007; 12(6):501-6. DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200611000-00010. View

2.
Araujo S, Bernardo W, Habr-Gama A, Kiss D, Cecconello I . DNA ploidy status and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of published data. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50(11):1800-10. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9013-6. View

3.
Heinzerling J, Anthony T, Livingston E, Huerta S . Predictors of distant metastasis and mortality in patients with stage II colorectal cancer. Am Surg. 2007; 73(3):230-8. View

4.
Chuang S, Su Y, Lu C, Hsu H, Sun L, Shih Y . Risk factors for the development of metachronous liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients after curative resection. World J Surg. 2010; 35(2):424-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0881-x. View

5.
Schmiegel W, Reinacher-Schick A, Arnold D, Graeven U, Heinemann V, Porschen R . [Update S3-guideline "colorectal cancer" 2008]. Z Gastroenterol. 2008; 46(8):799-840. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027726. View