» Articles » PMID: 23288875

A Content Analysis of Smokeless Tobacco Coverage in U.S. Newspapers and News Wires

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2013 Jan 5
PMID 23288875
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Research attention on smokeless tobacco (SLT) has focused on SLT use, health risks, harm-reduction potential, and risk perceptions, but few studies have examined mediated communications about SLT. This study aims to contribute to the literature by providing the first description of SLT coverage in the news, an important communication channel given its ability to educate and shape public opinion about tobacco issues.

Methods: A content analysis was conducted on SLT-related news and opinion articles between 2006 and 2010 from top circulating national and state newspapers and select news wires. Articles were coded for the main SLT topic, SLT risk references, and slant of opinion articles.

Results: SLT was discussed in news/feature articles (n = 677) in terms of business (28%), new products, product regulation and harm reduction (19%), prevention/cessation (11.4%), taxation (10.2%), profiles/trends in use (9%), bans (8.1%), and tobacco industry promotional activities (4.9%). Health risk references (i.e., addictiveness, carcinogenicity, and specific health effects including oral cancer) were found in 40% of articles, though frequency differed by article topic. Although the majority of opinion articles (n = 176) conveyed an anti-SLT slant (64%), 25.6% were pro-SLT.

Conclusions: SLT topics of both national and local importance are covered in the news. Public health professionals can participate in SLT coverage by sending in press releases about new study findings, events, or resources and by submitting opinion pieces to share views or respond to previous coverage. Research on SLT news should continue given its potential to shape the public's SLT knowledge and opinions.

Citing Articles

How does Indian news media report smokeless tobacco control? A content analysis of the gutka ban enforcement.

Dsouza V, Kembhavi P, Rao S P, P K, Hebbar P PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(3):e0001724.

PMID: 36972290 PMC: 10042338. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001724.


Newspaper Coverage of Snus in an Emerging Norwegian Snus Market 2002-2011: A Content Analysis.

Gunnar S, Rikke Iren T, Ingeborg L Nicotine Tob Res. 2021; 24(2):212-219.

PMID: 34463753 PMC: 8807211. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab171.


Smokers' Exposure to Perceived Modified Risk Claims for E-Cigarettes, Snus, and Smokeless Tobacco in the United States.

Wackowski O, OConnor R, Pearson J Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 23(3):605-608.

PMID: 32812028 PMC: 7885787. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa159.


Adult perceptions of the relative harm of tobacco products and subsequent tobacco product use: Longitudinal findings from waves 1 and 2 of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study.

Elton-Marshall T, Driezen P, Fong G, Cummings K, Persoskie A, Wackowski O Addict Behav. 2020; 106:106337.

PMID: 32145496 PMC: 7441471. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106337.


From the Deeming Rule to JUUL-US News Coverage of Electronic Cigarettes, 2015-2018.

Wackowski O, Sontag J, Singh B, King J, Lewis M, Steinberg M Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 22(10):1816-1822.

PMID: 32053188 PMC: 7542638. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa025.


References
1.
Rodu B, Cole P . Smokeless tobacco use among men in the United States, 2000 and 2005. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009; 38(7):545-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2009.00780.x. View

2.
Phillips C, Wang C, Guenzel B . You might as well smoke; the misleading and harmful public message about smokeless tobacco. BMC Public Health. 2005; 5:31. PMC: 1090592. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-31. View

3.
Levy D, Mumford E, Cummings K, Gilpin E, Giovino G, Hyland A . The relative risks of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product compared with smoking cigarettes: estimates of a panel of experts. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004; 13(12):2035-42. View

4.
Boffetta P, Straif K . Use of smokeless tobacco and risk of myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ. 2009; 339:b3060. PMC: 2728803. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b3060. View

5.
Wenger L, Malone R, Bero L . The cigar revival and the popular press: a content analysis, 1987-1997. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(2):288-91. PMC: 1446522. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.288. View