» Articles » PMID: 23274700

Non-operative Treatment Versus Percutaneous Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts in Children

Overview
Date 2013 Jan 1
PMID 23274700
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to characterize the clinical course and outcomes of children with pancreatic pseudocysts that were initially treated non-operatively or with percutaneous drainage.

Methods: A retrospective review of children with pancreatic pseudocysts over a 12-year period was completed. Categorical variables were compared using Fischer's exact method and the Student's t test was used to compare continuous variables. Analysis was done using logistic and linear regression models.

Results: Thirty-six children met the criteria for pancreatic pseudocyst and 33 children were treated either non-operatively or with percutaneous drainage. Of the 22 children managed non-operatively, 17 required no additional intervention (77 %) and five required surgery. Operative procedures were: Frey procedure (3), distal pancreatectomy (1), and cystgastrostomy (1). Eight of the 11 children treated with initial percutaneous drainage required no additional treatment (72 %). The other three children underwent distal pancreatectomy. Success of non-operative management or percutaneous drainage was not dependent on size or complexity of the pseudocyst Logistic regression did not identify any patient demographic (gender, age, and weight), etiologic (trauma, non-traumatic pancreatitis) or pseudocyst characteristic (size, septations) that predicted failure of non-operative therapy.

Conclusions: In children, pancreatic pseudocysts can frequently be managed without surgery regardless of size or complexity of the pseudocyst. When an intervention is needed, percutaneous drainage can be performed successfully, avoiding the need for major surgical intervention in the majority of patients.

Citing Articles

[Pancreatic pseudocyst in children: about 7 cases].

Cherrabi H, Aboueljaoud H, Harouna A, El Madi A, Khattala K, Bouabdallah Y Pan Afr Med J. 2019; 32:77.

PMID: 31223368 PMC: 6560979. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.77.14688.


Outcome of radiological interventions in pediatric gastrointestinal diseases: A large tertiary center experience.

Nabi Z, Singh J, Haris A, Shava U, Chavan R, Reddy D JGH Open. 2019; 3(2):140-147.

PMID: 31061889 PMC: 6487811. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12119.


Identification of risk factors for pancreatic pseudocysts formation, intervention and recurrence: a 15-year retrospective analysis in a tertiary hospital in China.

Tan J, Zhou L, Cao R, Zhang G BMC Gastroenterol. 2018; 18(1):143.

PMID: 30285639 PMC: 6167814. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-018-0874-z.

References
1.
Paul M, Mooney D . The management of pancreatic injuries in children: operate or observe. J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46(6):1140-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.041. View

2.
Baron T, Harewood G, Morgan D, Yates M . Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56(1):7-17. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.125106. View

3.
Jaffe R, Arata Jr J, Matlak M . Percutaneous drainage of traumatic pancreatic pseudocysts in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989; 152(3):591-5. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.3.591. View

4.
Shilyansky J, Sena L, Kreller M, Chait P, Babyn P, FILLER R . Nonoperative management of pancreatic injuries in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33(2):343-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90459-6. View

5.
Benifla M, Weizman Z . Acute pancreatitis in childhood: analysis of literature data. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003; 37(2):169-72. DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200308000-00015. View