Cost-effectiveness of Minimal Interventional Procedures for Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: Design of Four Randomised Controlled Trials with an Economic Evaluation

Overview

Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology

Date 2013 Jan 1

PMID 23273213

Citations 13

Authors

Esther T Maas

Johan N S Juch

J George Groeneweg

Raymond W J G Ostelo

Bart W Koes

Arianne P Verhagen

Merel van Raamt

Frank Wille

Frank J P M Huygen

Maurits W Van Tulder

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Minimal interventional procedures are frequently applied in patients with mechanical low back pain which is defined as pain presumably resulting from single sources: facet, disc, sacroiliac joint or a combination of these. Usually, these minimal interventional procedures are an integral part of a multidisciplinary pain programme. A recent systematic review issued by the Dutch Health Insurance Council showed that the effectiveness of these procedures for the total group of patients with chronic low back pain is yet unclear and cost-effectiveness unknown. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a multidisciplinary pain programme with minimal interventional procedures is cost-effective compared to the multidisciplinary pain programme alone for patients with chronic mechanical low back pain who did not respond to conservative primary care and were referred to a pain clinic.

Methods: All patients with chronic low back pain who are referred to one of the 13 participating pain clinics will be asked to participate in an observational study. Patients with a suspected diagnosis of facet, disc or sacroiliac joint problems will receive a diagnostic block to confirm this diagnosis. If confirmed, they will be asked to participate in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). For each single source a separate RCT will be conducted. Patients with a combination of facet, disc or sacroiliac joint problems will be invited for participation in a RCT as well. An economic evaluation from a societal perspective will be performed alongside these four RCTs. Patients will complete questionnaires at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after start of the treatment. Costs will be collected using self-completed cost questionnaires.

Discussion: No trials are yet available which have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of minimal interventional procedures in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain, which emphasizes the importance of this study.

Trial Registration Number: National Trial Register: NTR3531.

Citing Articles

The Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Between Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Provocative Discography in the Identification of Chronic Low Back Pain Surgery Candidates.

Wilson L, Beall D, Eastlack R, Berven S, Lotz J Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025; 17:19-31.

PMID: 39872472 PMC: 11771157. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S501058.

Evaluation of effectiveness of osteopathic visceral manipulation in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain: A multi-center, single-blind, randomized-controlled study.

Altinbilek T, Murat S, Yildirim E, Filiz B, Unlu S, Terzi R Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024; 69(4):500-509.

PMID: 38766590 PMC: 11099862. DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12541.

To what extent does the use of crosswalks instead of EQ-5D value sets impact reimbursement decisions?: a simulation study.

Jornada Ben A, Van Dongen J, Finch A, El Alili M, Bosmans J Eur J Health Econ. 2022; 24(8):1253-1270.

PMID: 36371791 PMC: 10533624. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01539-6.

Can EQ-5D-3L utility values of low back pain patients be validly predicted by the Oswestry Disability Index for use in cost-effectiveness analyses?.

Pellekooren S, Ben A, Bosmans J, Ostelo R, Van Tulder M, Maas E Qual Life Res. 2022; 31(7):2153-2165.

PMID: 35040002 PMC: 9188530. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03082-6.

Predictive factors of high societal costs among chronic low back pain patients.

Mutubuki E, Luitjens M, Maas E, Huygen F, Ostelo R, Van Tulder M Eur J Pain. 2019; 24(2):325-337.

PMID: 31566839 PMC: 7003839. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1488.

References

Terluin B, van Marwijk H, Ader H, de Vet H, Penninx B, Hermens M . The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. BMC Psychiatry. 2006; 6:34. PMC: 1590008. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-34. View

Koopmanschap M, Rutten F . A practical guide for calculating indirect costs of disease. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996; 10(5):460-6. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199610050-00003. View

Davidson M, Keating J . A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2002; 82(1):8-24. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/82.1.8. View

Cahana A, Romagnioli S . Not all placebos are the same: a debate on the ethics of placebo use in clinical trials versus clinical practice. J Anesth. 2007; 21(1):102-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-006-0440-7. View

Waddell G . Subgroups within "nonspecific" low back pain. J Rheumatol. 2005; 32(3):395-6. View

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Datta S, Cohen S, Hirsch J . Comprehensive review of epidemiology, scope, and impact of spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2009; 12(4):E35-70. View

Krismer M, van Tulder M . Strategies for prevention and management of musculoskeletal conditions. Low back pain (non-specific). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007; 21(1):77-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2006.08.004. View

Deyo R, Weinstein J . Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(5):363-70. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200102013440508. View

Koes B, van Tulder M, Thomas S . Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. BMJ. 2006; 332(7555):1430-4. PMC: 1479671. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7555.1430. View

10.

Ostelo R, Deyo R, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M . Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(1):90-4. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10. View

11.

Hays R, Morales L . The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med. 2001; 33(5):350-7. DOI: 10.3109/07853890109002089. View

12.

Kraaimaat F, Evers A . Pain-coping strategies in chronic pain patients: psychometric characteristics of the pain-coping inventory (PCI). Int J Behav Med. 2004; 10(4):343-63. DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1004_5. View

13.

Vlaeyen J, Geurts S, Kole-Snijders A, Schuerman J, Groenman N, van Eek H . What do chronic pain patients think of their pain? Towards a pain cognition questionnaire. Br J Clin Psychol. 1990; 29(4):383-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1990.tb00901.x. View

14.

Bombardier C . Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3100-3. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00003. View

15.

Lousberg R, van Breukelen G, Groenman N, Schmidt A, Arntz A, Winter F . Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Dutch language version (MPI-DLV). Behav Res Ther. 1999; 37(2):167-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00137-5. View

16.

Henschke N, Kuijpers T, Rubinstein S, van Middelkoop M, Ostelo R, Verhagen A . Trends over time in the size and quality of randomised controlled trials of interventions for chronic low-back pain. Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(3):375-81. PMC: 3296855. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2023-z. View

17.

Aydin S, Gharibo C, Mehnert M, Stitik T . The role of radiofrequency ablation for sacroiliac joint pain: a meta-analysis. PM R. 2010; 2(9):842-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.03.035. View

18.

Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers P, Kempen G, Speckens A, van Hemert A . A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997; 27(2):363-70. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291796004382. View

19.

Henschke N, Kuijpers T, Rubinstein S, van Middelkoop M, Ostelo R, Verhagen A . Injection therapy and denervation procedures for chronic low-back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(9):1425-49. PMC: 2989278. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1411-0. View

20.

Goossens M, Rutten-van Molken M, Vlaeyen J, van der Linden S . The cost diary: a method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost-effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53(7):688-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00177-8. View