» Articles » PMID: 23264537

Six Weeks of a Polarized Training-intensity Distribution Leads to Greater Physiological and Performance Adaptations Than a Threshold Model in Trained Cyclists

Overview
Date 2012 Dec 25
PMID 23264537
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was undertaken to investigate physiological adaptation with two endurance-training periods differing in intensity distribution. In a randomized crossover fashion, separated by 4 wk of detraining, 12 male cyclists completed two 6-wk training periods: 1) a polarized model [6.4 (±1.4 SD) h/wk; 80%, 0%, and 20% of training time in low-, moderate-, and high-intensity zones, respectively]; and 2) a threshold model [7.5 (±2.0 SD) h/wk; 57%, 43%, and 0% training-intensity distribution]. Before and after each training period, following 2 days of diet and exercise control, fasted skeletal muscle biopsies were obtained for mitochondrial enzyme activity and monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) 1 and 4 expression, and morning first-void urine samples were collected for NMR spectroscopy-based metabolomics analysis. Endurance performance (40-km time trial), incremental exercise, peak power output (PPO), and high-intensity exercise capacity (95% maximal work rate to exhaustion) were also assessed. Endurance performance, PPOs, lactate threshold (LT), MCT4, and high-intensity exercise capacity all increased over both training periods. Improvements were greater following polarized rather than threshold for PPO [mean (±SE) change of 8 (±2)% vs. 3 (±1)%, P < 0.05], LT [9 (±3)% vs. 2 (±4)%, P < 0.05], and high-intensity exercise capacity [85 (±14)% vs. 37 (±14)%, P < 0.05]. No changes in mitochondrial enzyme activities or MCT1 were observed following training. A significant multilevel, partial least squares-discriminant analysis model was obtained for the threshold model but not the polarized model in the metabolomics analysis. A polarized training distribution results in greater systemic adaptation over 6 wk in already well-trained cyclists. Markers of muscle metabolic adaptation are largely unchanged, but metabolomics markers suggest different cellular metabolic stress that requires further investigation.

Citing Articles

Which Training Intensity Distribution Intervention will Produce the Greatest Improvements in Maximal Oxygen Uptake and Time-Trial Performance in Endurance Athletes? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data.

Rosenblat M, Watt J, Arnold J, Treff G, Sandbakk O, Esteve-Lanao J Sports Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39888556 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-02149-3.


The Metabolome Characteristics of Aerobic Endurance Development in Adolescent Male Rowers Using Polarized and Threshold Model: An Original Research.

Kong F, Zhu M, Pan X, Zhao L, Yang S, Zhuo J Metabolites. 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39852360 PMC: 11767037. DOI: 10.3390/metabo15010017.


The Effect of Polarized Training Intensity Distribution on Maximal Oxygen Uptake and Work Economy Among Endurance Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Nost H, Aune M, van den Tillaar R Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39728866 PMC: 11679080. DOI: 10.3390/sports12120326.


The Training Intensity Distribution of Marathon Runners Across Performance Levels.

Muniz-Pumares D, Hunter B, Meyler S, Maunder E, Smyth B Sports Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39616560 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-02137-7.


Greater improvement in aerobic capacity after a polarized training program including cycling interval training at low cadence (50-70 RPM) than freely chosen cadence (above 80 RPM).

Hebisz R, Hebisz P PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0311833.

PMID: 39536034 PMC: 11559993. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311833.